Measurement Characteristics of Near-Surface Currents from Ultra-Thin Drifters, Drogued Drifters, and HF Radar

Concurrent measurements by satellite tracked drifters of different hull and drogue configurations and coastal high-frequency radar reveal substantial differences in estimates of the near-surface velocity. These measurements are important for understanding and predicting material transport on the ocean surface as well as the vertical structure of the near-surface currents. These near-surface current observations were obtained during a field experiment in the northern Gulf of Mexico intended to test a new ultra-thin drifter design. During the experiment, thirty small cylindrical drifters with 5 cm height, twenty-eight similar drifters with 10 cm hull height, and fourteen drifters with 91 cm tall drogues centered at 100 cm depth were deployed within the footprint of coastal High-Frequency (HF) radar. Comparison of collocated velocity measurements reveals systematic differences in surface velocity estimates obtained from the different measurement techniques, as well as provides information on properties of the drifter behavior and near-surface shear. Results show that the HF radar velocity estimates had magnitudes significantly lower than the 5 cm and 10 cm drifter velocity of approximately 45% and 35%, respectively. The HF radar velocity magnitudes were similar to the drogued drifter velocity. Analysis of wave directional spectra measurements reveals that surface Stokes drift accounts for much of the velocity difference between the drogued drifters and the thin surface drifters except during times of wave breaking.

[1]  John F. Vesecky,et al.  A comparison of multifrequency HF radar and ADCP measurements of near-surface currents during COPE-3 , 2001 .

[2]  A. Melsom.  Effects of wave breaking on the surface drift , 1996 .

[3]  Robert H. Stewart,et al.  HF radio measurements of surface currents , 1974 .

[4]  J. Bye.  WIND‐DRIVEN CIRCULATION IN UNSTRATIFIED LAKES , 1965 .

[5]  Alexander V. Babanin,et al.  Breaking Probability for Dominant Waves on the Sea Surface , 2000 .

[6]  Hans C. Graber,et al.  On the accuracy of HF radar surface current measurements: Intercomparisons with ship‐based sensors , 1997 .

[7]  H. Kapitza,et al.  Surface drifters in the German Bight: model validation considering windage and Stokes drift , 2017 .

[8]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  Drifter observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The statistical and dynamical views , 1985 .

[9]  David W. Wang,et al.  Use of advanced directional wave spectra analysis methods , 1999 .

[10]  L. Oey,et al.  The Stokes drift and wave induced-mass flux in the North Pacific , 2012 .

[11]  J. McWilliams,et al.  The Wavy Ekman Layer: Langmuir Circulations, Breaking Waves, and Reynolds Stress , 2012 .

[12]  Kern E. Kenyon,et al.  Stokes drift for random gravity waves , 1969 .

[13]  Jochen Horstmann,et al.  Near-surface current mapping by shipboard marine X-band radar: A validation , 2018 .

[14]  Tamay M. Özgökmen,et al.  A Biodegradable Surface Drifter for Ocean Sampling on a Massive Scale , 2017 .

[15]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  An oilspill trajectory analysis model with a variable wind deflection angle , 1982 .

[16]  Fabrice Ardhuin,et al.  Observation and estimation of Lagrangian, Stokes and Eulerian currents induced by wind and waves at the sea surface , 2008, 0810.3537.

[17]  E. Chassignet,et al.  Circulation and cross-shelf transport in the Florida Big Bend , 2015 .

[18]  Bryan W. Stiles,et al.  Estimating Ocean Vector Winds and Currents Using a Ka-Band Pencil-Beam Doppler Scatterometer , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[19]  198 ON THE THEORY OF OSCILLATORY WAVES , 2022 .

[20]  J. Delouis,et al.  Measuring currents, ice drift, and waves from space: the Sea surface KInematics Multiscale monitoring (SKIM) concept , 2017 .

[21]  Libe Washburn,et al.  Interpretation of Coastal HF Radar–Derived Surface Currents with High-Resolution Drifter Data , 2007 .

[22]  G. Voulgaris,et al.  Bulk versus Spectral Wave Parameters: Implications on Stokes Drift Estimates, Regional Wave Modeling, and HF Radars Applications , 2017 .

[23]  J. Bye.  The coupling of wave drift and wind velocity profiles , 1988 .

[24]  Shuyi S. Chen,et al.  Hurricane‐induced ocean waves and stokes drift and their impacts on surface transport and dispersion in the Gulf of Mexico , 2016 .