Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings

Abstract The benefits of utilizing intermediaries to broker understanding between environmental scientists and policy makers have become widely touted. Yet little is known about the tasks boundary spanners undertake to develop environmental policy solutions and how these tasks fit into frameworks intended to advance public policy decision making. Such frameworks may be constructed to aid decision makers in differentiating between the types of environmental policy issues that confront them or the policy settings in which they are operating. Consequently, this paper examines how six different knowledge brokering strategies; informing, consulting, matchmaking, engaging, collaborating and building capacity might be employed in responding to different types of environmental policy problems or policy settings identified in decision aiding frameworks. Using real world examples, four frameworks are reviewed. They are; Lindquist's [Lindquist, E.A., 1988. What do decision models tell us about information use? Knowledge in Society 1 (2), 86–111; Lindquist, E.A., 1990. The third community, policy inquiry, and social scientists. In: Stephen Brooks, S., Gagnon, A. (Eds.), Social Scientists, Policy and the State. Praeger, New York; Lindquist, E.A., 2001. Discerning policy influence: framework for a strategic evaluation of IDRC-Supported research] decision regimes, Turnhout et al.’s [Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M., Eijsackers, H., 2007. Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators 7 (2), 215–228] science policy typology, Holling's [Holling, C.S., 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 3–34] adaptive cycle and Kurtz and Snowden's [Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J., 2003. The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal 42 (3), 462–483] Cynefin domains. For the different problem types or policy settings described in the decision aiding frameworks primary knowledge brokering strategies are identified. While the frameworks differ in their conceptual constructions, the applicability of specific knowledge brokering strategies serve as a commonality across particular problem types and policy settings.

[1]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[2]  B. Jones,et al.  Information Processing and Policy Dynamics , 2009 .

[3]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[4]  Symbols and Political Quiescence , 1960 .

[5]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[6]  David H. Guston,et al.  Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.

[7]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[8]  Gene Lessard,et al.  An adaptive approach to planning and decision-making , 1998 .

[9]  K. Rader,et al.  Science in the Everyday World , 2008, Isis.

[10]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[11]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[12]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Ecological Indicators: between the two fires of science and policy , 2007 .

[13]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions , 1997 .

[14]  Evert A. Lindquist,et al.  What do decision models tell us about information use? , 1988 .

[15]  J. Holmes,et al.  Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation , 2008 .

[16]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Resilience of past landscapes: Resilience theory, society, and the Longue Durée , 2003 .

[17]  David W. Cash,et al.  Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes , 2000 .

[18]  John Stone,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 2007 .

[19]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[20]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Science in Wadden Sea policy: from accommodation to advocacy , 2008 .

[21]  F. Brand,et al.  Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object , 2007 .

[22]  Steven Kelly,et al.  Science, technical expertise and the human environment , 2003 .

[23]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[24]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Information in Communicative Planning , 1998 .

[25]  S. Michaels,et al.  Considering Knowledge Uptake within a Cycle of Transforming Data, Information, and Knowledge , 2006 .

[26]  S. Brooks,et al.  Social Scientists, Policy, and the State: , 1990 .

[27]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[28]  T. Keating.  Lessons from the Recent History of the Health Effects Institute , 2001 .

[29]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[30]  David W. Cash,et al.  Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making , 2006 .

[31]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  Kenneth H. Williams,et al.  Protocol and Practice in the Adaptive Management of Waterfowl Harvests , 1999 .

[33]  N. Sewankambo,et al.  Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: The need for support structures. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[34]  Karl A. Schaefer,et al.  From Science Communication to Knowledge Brokering: the Shift from ‘Science Push’ to ‘Policy Pull’ , 2008 .

[35]  C. Zimmer.  Life After Chaos , 1999, Science.

[36]  Peter Galison,et al.  Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science , 2008, Isis.

[37]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[38]  Alan Shiell,et al.  A simple guide to chaos and complexity , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[39]  J. Pielke,et al.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[40]  J. Ostrowski,et al.  Local Government Capacity Building , 1984 .

[41]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Reconceiving Science and Policy: Academic, Fiducial and Bureaucratic Knowledge , 1999 .

[42]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Embracing Watershed Politics , 2008 .

[43]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[44]  P. Masters,et al.  Confronting a tough issue: Fertility control and translocation for over‐abundant Koalas on Kangaroo Island, South Australia , 2005 .

[45]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[46]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[47]  Stephen Alfred Forbes,et al.  The Lake as a Microcosm , 1925 .

[48]  C. Blackmore.  What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas? A theoretical overview , 2007 .

[49]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Resilience, Adaptive Capacity, and the “Lock-in Trap” of the Western Australian Agricultural Region , 2004 .

[50]  E. Lindquist.  Public managers and policy communities: learning to meet new challenges , 1992 .

[51]  Perspectives Around Emergent Connectivity, Sense-Making and Asymmetric Threat Management , 2006 .

[52]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[53]  Michael Elliott,et al.  How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed Marine Strategy Directive. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[54]  John M. Briggs,et al.  Assessing the Rate, Mechanisms, and Consequences of the Conversion of Tallgrass Prairie to Juniperus virginiana Forest , 2002, Ecosystems.

[55]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Getting to Maybe: How the World Is Changed , 2008 .

[56]  S. Sismondo.  An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies , 2003 .

[57]  P. Sabatier.  An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[58]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Adaptive harvest management of North American waterfowl populations: a brief history and future prospects , 2007, Journal of Ornithology.

[59]  Ken Genskow,et al.  Organizational Dynamics of Watershed Partnerships: A Key to Integrated Water Resources Management , 2009 .

[60]  Donghong Cheng.  Communicating science in social contexts : new models, new practices , 2008 .

[61]  Douglas Torgerson.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Democracy through policy discourse , 2003 .

[62]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Loss of Resilience, Crisis, and Institutional Change: Lessons from an Intensive Agricultural System in Southeastern Australia , 2006, Ecosystems.

[63]  Eva Lövbrand.  Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science , 2007 .

[64]  A. C. Haddon.  ANTHROPOLOGY AT THE SOUTH AFRICAN MEETING OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, 1905. , 1906, Science.

[65]  Lisa Dilling,et al.  Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science , 2007 .

[66]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[67]  E. Lindquist.  Discerning policy influence : framework for a strategic evaluation of IDRC - supported research , 2001 .

[68]  Ileana M. Porras.  Ozone Discourses. Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation.@@@The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. , 1994, American Journal of International Law.

[69]  P. Sabatier.  Swimming upstream : collaborative approaches to watershed management , 2005 .

[70]  S. Bocking.  Nature's Experts: Science, Politics, and the Environment , 2004 .

[71]  Michael E. Kraft,et al.  Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives , 2003 .

[72]  M. Lynch,et al.  The handbook of science and technology studies , 2008 .

[73]  S. Michaels,et al.  Policy Windows, Policy Change, and Organizational Learning: Watersheds in the Evolution of Watershed Management , 2006, Environmental management.

[74]  Matthew Alan Cahn,et al.  Public Policy: The Essential Readings , 1994 .

[75]  J. Lubchenco.  Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[76]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[77]  Murray Edelman,et al.  The symbolic uses of politics , 1967 .

[78]  F. Johnson,et al.  MANAGING NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY , 1995 .

[79]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2001 .

[81]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[82]  C. Montes,et al.  Rethinking the Galapagos Islands as a Complex Social-Ecological System: Implications for Conservation and Management , 2008 .

[83]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  The Public Policy Theory Primer , 2009 .

[84]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Contents , 2003 .

[85]  Gary Brierley,et al.  Information Needs for Environmental-Flow Allocation: A Case Study from the Lachlan River, New South Wales, Australia , 2002 .

[86]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[87]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[88]  N. Klomp,et al.  Frontiers in ecology : building the links , 1997 .

[89]  M. Kraft.  Environmental Policy and Politics , 1996 .

[90]  W. Adger,et al.  Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework , 2007 .

[91]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[92]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Boundaries of Science , 1995 .

[93]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .