Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany

BackgroundThe way patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are treated is partly determined by non-medical factors. There is a solid body of evidence that patient and physician characteristics influence doctors' management decisions. Relatively little is known about the role of structural issues in the decision making process. This study focuses on the question whether doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are influenced by the health care system in which they take place. This non-medical determinant of medical decision-making was investigated in an international research project in the US, the UK and Germany.MethodsVideotaped patients within an experimental study design were used. Experienced actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patients of different sex, age and social status. The videotapes were shown to 384 randomly selected primary care physicians in the three countries under study. The sample was stratified on gender and duration of professional experience. Physicians were asked how they would diagnose and manage the patient after watching the video vignette using a questionnaire with standardised and open-ended questions.ResultsResults show only small differences in decision making between British and American physicians in essential aspects of care. About 90% of the UK and US doctors identified CHD as one of the possible diagnoses. Further similarities were found in test ordering and lifestyle advice. Some differences between the US and UK were found in the certainty of the diagnoses, prescribed medications and referral behaviour. There are numerous significant differences between Germany and the other two countries. German physicians would ask fewer questions, they would order fewer tests, prescribe fewer medications and give less lifestyle advice.ConclusionAlthough all physicians in the three countries under study were presented exactly the same patient, some disparities in the diagnostic and patient management decisions were evident. Since other possible influences on doctors treatment decisions are controlled within the experimental design, characteristics of the health care system seem to be a crucial factor within the decision making process.

[1]  J. Richardson,et al.  Supplier-Induced Demand , 2006, Applied health economics and health policy.

[2]  L. Kasten,et al.  Patient, physician and presentational influences on clinical decision making for breast cancer: results from a factorial experiment. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  C. DesRoches,et al.  Confronting competing demands to improve quality: a five-country hospital survey. , 2004, Health affairs.

[4]  W. Edmondstone,et al.  Cardiac chest pain: does body language help the diagnosis? , 1995, BMJ.

[5]  How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experiment. , 2006, Health services research.

[6]  Stephen M Shortell,et al.  The impact of health plan delivery system organization on clinical quality and patient satisfaction. , 2006, Health Services Research.

[7]  C. DesRoches,et al.  Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. , 2003, Health affairs.

[8]  Ronald Aylmer Sir Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods, Experimental Design, and Scientific Inference , 1990 .

[9]  G. Wilensky Medicare managed care. Why is it coming? , 1997, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[10]  D. Madden,et al.  GP reimbursement and visiting behaviour in Ireland. , 2005, Health economics.

[11]  K. Freund,et al.  The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: results of an experiment. , 2002, Journal of health and social behavior.

[12]  G. Marcus,et al.  The utility of gestures in patients with chest discomfort. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Mckinlay,et al.  Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently? , 2008, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[14]  R. Evans,et al.  Supplier-Induced Demand: Some Empirical Evidence and Implications , 1974 .

[15]  J. Mckinlay,et al.  Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: a video-simulation experiment. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[16]  L. Kasten,et al.  Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: an experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey sampling. , 1997, Health services research.

[17]  R. Luepker,et al.  Comparison of treatment and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, and Göteborg, Sweden. , 2003, American heart journal.

[18]  K. Davis,et al.  Primary care and health system performance: adults' experiences in five countries. , 2004, Health affairs.

[19]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care. , 2004, JAMA.

[20]  Philip Jacobs,et al.  The economics of health and medical care , 1987 .

[21]  J W Peabody,et al.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. , 2000, JAMA.