Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis.

Pressure retarded osmosis has the potential to utilize the free energy of mixing when fresh river water flows into the sea for clean and renewable power generation. Here, we present a systematic investigation of the performance limiting phenomena in pressure retarded osmosis--external concentration polarization, internal concentration polarization, and reverse draw salt flux--and offer insights on the design criteria of a high performance pressure retarded osmosis power generation system. Thin-film composite polyamide membranes were chemically modified to produce a range of membrane transport properties, and the water and salt permeabilities were characterized to determine the underlying permeability-selectivity trade-off relationship. We show that power density is constrained by the trade-off between permeability and selectivity of the membrane active layer. This behavior is attributed to the opposing influence of the beneficial effect of membrane water permeability and the detrimental impact of reverse salt flux coupled with internal concentration polarization. Our analysis reveals the intricate influence of active and support layer properties on power density and demonstrates that membrane performance is maximized by tailoring the water and salt permeabilities to the structural parameters. An analytical parameter that quantifies the relative influence of each performance limiting phenomena is employed to identify the dominant effect restricting productivity. External concentration polarization is shown to be the main factor limiting performance at high power densities. Enhancement of the hydrodynamic flow conditions in the membrane feed channel reduces external concentration polarization and thus, yields improved power density. However, doing so will also incur additional operating costs due to the accompanying hydraulic pressure loss. This study demonstrates that by thoughtful selection of the membrane properties and hydrodynamic conditions, the detrimental effects that limit productivity in a pressure retarded osmosis power generation process can be methodically minimized to achieve high performance.

[1]  Guy Z. Ramon,et al.  Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power , 2011 .

[2]  Rong Wang,et al.  Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forwar , 2011 .

[3]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[4]  Xiaoxiao Song,et al.  Nano Gives the Answer: Breaking the Bottleneck of Internal Concentration Polarization with a Nanofiber Composite Forward Osmosis Membrane for a High Water Production Rate , 2011, Advanced materials.

[5]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  T. Arnot,et al.  A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalinationDevelopment to date and future poten , 2011 .

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[8]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Stein Erik Skilhagen Osmotic power — a new, renewable energy source , 2010 .

[12]  A. Achilli,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis : From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the fi rst experimental installation — Review , 2010 .

[13]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[14]  B. Freeman,et al.  An empirical correlation of gas permeability and permselectivity in polymers and its theoretical basis , 2009 .

[15]  박호범,et al.  Water Permeability and Water/Salt Selectivity Tradeoff in Polymers for Desalination , 2009 .

[16]  Qian Yang,et al.  Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination , 2008 .

[18]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Change of chemical composition and hydrogen bonding behavior due to chlorination of crosslinked polyamide membranes , 2008 .

[19]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Membranes for Power Generation by Pressure Retarded Osmosis , 2008 .

[20]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation , 2007 .

[21]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes : Implications for wastewater reclamation , 2007 .

[22]  J. Leckie,et al.  Hypochlorite degradation of crosslinked polyamide membranes: II. Changes in hydrogen bonding behavior and performance , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes , 2005 .

[24]  Viatcheslav Freger,et al.  Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization , 2003 .

[25]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[26]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .

[27]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Basis of Permeability/Selectivity Tradeoff Relations in Polymeric Gas Separation Membranes , 1999 .

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  The search for a chlorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane , 1994 .

[29]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[30]  L. Robeson,et al.  Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes , 1991 .

[31]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[32]  M. Zachariah,et al.  A mechanistic study of halogen interaction with polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes , 1985 .

[33]  H. Tamura,et al.  Chlorine-resistant membrane for reverse osmosis. I: Correlation between chemical structures and chlorine resistance of polyamides , 1984 .

[34]  Julius Glater,et al.  REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE SENSITIVITY TO OZONE AND HALOGEN DISINFECTANTS , 1983 .

[35]  Sidney Loeb,et al.  Production of energy from concentrated brines by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1976 .

[36]  R. S. Norman,et al.  Osmotic power plants. , 1975, Science.

[37]  R. E. Pattle Production of Electric Power by mixing Fresh and Salt Water in the Hydroelectric Pile , 1954, Nature.