Hydrologic and water quality responses to biomass production in the Tennessee river basin

Reducing dependence on fossil‐based energy has raised interest in biofuels as a potential energy source, but concerns have been raised about potential implications for water quality. These effects may vary regionally depending on the biomass feedstocks and changes in land management. Here, we focused on the Tennessee River Basin (TRB), USA. According to the recent 2016 Billion‐Ton Report (BT16) by the US Department of Energy, under two future scenarios (base‐case and high‐yield), three perennial feedstocks show high potential for growing profitably in the TRB: switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus), and willow (Salix spp.). We used the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to compare hydrology and water quality for a current landscape with those simulated for two future BT16 landscapes. We combined publicly available temporal and geospatial datasets with local land and water management information to realistically represent physical characteristics of the watershed. We developed a new autocalibration tool (SWATopt) to calibrate and evaluate SWAT in the TRB with reservoir operations, including comparison against synthetic and intermediate response variables derived from gage measurements. Our spatiotemporal evaluation enables to more realistically simulate the current situation, which gives us more confidence to project the effects of land‐use changes on water quality. Under both future BT16 scenarios, simulated nitrate and total nitrogen loadings and concentrations were greatly reduced relative to the current landscape, whereas runoff, sediment, and phosphorus showed only small changes. Difference between simulated water results for the two future scenarios was small. The influence of biomass production on water quantity and quality depended on the crop, area planted, and management practices, as well as on site‐specific characteristics. These results offer hope that bioenergy production in the TRB could help to protect the region's rivers from nitrogen pollution by providing a market for perennial crops with low nutrient input requirements.

[1]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[2]  Matthew H. Langholtz,et al.  2016 Billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy, Volume 1: Economic availability of feedstock , 2016 .

[3]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Modeling Miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Jun Xia,et al.  Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: A case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China , 2009 .

[5]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[6]  George B. Arhonditsis,et al.  Evaluation of the current state of distributed watershed nutrient water quality modeling. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  A. Nejadhashemi,et al.  Water quality impact assessment of large-scale biofuel crops expansion in agricultural regions of Michigan , 2011 .

[8]  John W. Nicklow,et al.  Multi-objective automatic calibration of SWAT using NSGA-II , 2007 .

[9]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  A large-scale, high-resolution hydrological model parameter data set for climate change impact assessment for the conterminous US , 2013 .

[10]  C. Daly,et al.  Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM‐ELM model , 2018 .

[11]  K. Price,et al.  Morphological and sedimentological responses of streams to human impact in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, USA , 2006 .

[12]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Multimetric spatial optimization of switchgrass plantings across a watershed , 2012 .

[13]  R. Cibin,et al.  Evaluation of bioenergy crop growth and the impacts of bioenergy crops on streamflow, tile drain flow and nutrient losses in an extensively tile-drained watershed using SWAT. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[16]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Fish Functional Traits Correlated with Environmental Variables in a Temperate Biodiversity Hotspot , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Hydrologic Modelling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool , 1998 .

[18]  Daniel Coppard,et al.  Quantitative Review , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[19]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Improvement of the R-SWAT-FME framework to support multiple variables and multi-objective functions. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Anne B. Hoos,et al.  Spatial analysis of instream nitrogen loads and factors controlling nitrogen delivery to streams in the southeastern United States using spatially referenced regression on watershed attributes (SPARROW) and regional classification frameworks , 2009 .

[21]  Michael E. Barber,et al.  SWAT modeling with uncertainty and cluster analyses of tillage impacts on hydrological processes , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[22]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[23]  J. Bölscher,et al.  Hydrological modelling of changes in the water balance due to the impact of woody biomass production in the North German Plain , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[24]  G. Helfman,et al.  MULTISCALE INFLUENCES ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL STREAM CONDITIONS ACROSS BLUE RIDGE LANDSCAPES 1 , 2002 .

[25]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[26]  Timothy A. Cohn,et al.  Load Estimator (LOADEST): A FORTRAN Program for Estimating Constituent Loads in Streams and Rivers , 2004 .

[27]  Shu-lin Chen,et al.  A review on parameterization and uncertainty in modeling greenhouse gas emissions from soil , 2012 .

[28]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[29]  W. Cao,et al.  Multi‐variable and multi‐site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability , 2006 .

[30]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A refined regional modeling approach for the Corn Belt – Experiences and recommendations for large-scale integrated modeling , 2015 .

[31]  G. Johnson,et al.  Yields of willow biomass crops across a range of sites in North America , 2011 .

[32]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Forecasting changes in water quality in rivers associated with growing biofuels in the Arkansas‐White‐Red river drainage, USA , 2015 .

[33]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT , 2007 .

[34]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Modeling of land use and reservoir effects on nonpoint source pollution in a highly agricultural basin. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[35]  E. Fabio,et al.  Effects of nitrogen fertilization in shrub willow short rotation coppice production – a quantitative review , 2018 .

[36]  Multi-variable and Multi-site Calibration and Validation of SWAT for the Gap River Catchment , 2006 .

[37]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement , 2015 .

[38]  W. Dodds,et al.  Headwater Influences on Downstream Water Quality , 2007, Environmental management.

[39]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Biomass Production in Switchgrass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield , 2010 .

[40]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[41]  James D. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity on the brink: an assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[42]  R. Cibin,et al.  Water Quality Assessment of Large‐scale Bioenergy Cropping Scenarios for the Upper Mississippi and Ohio‐Tennessee River Basins , 2017 .

[43]  J. Xia,et al.  Improvement of SWAT2000 modelling to assess the impact of dams and sluices on streamflow in the Huai River basin of China , 2010 .

[44]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Progress toward evaluating the sustainability of switchgrass as a bioenergy crop using the SWAT model. , 2010 .

[45]  Comment on "Modeling miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop". , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Profitability of Willow Biomass Crops Affected by Incentive Programs , 2013, BioEnergy Research.

[47]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy , 2016 .

[48]  Herbert Ssegane,et al.  An Integrated Landscape Designed for Commodity and Bioenergy Crops for a Tile-Drained Agricultural Watershed. , 2016, Journal of environmental quality.

[49]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model , 2009 .