Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density

Abstract Maize ( Zea mays L.) hybrids differ in their response to plant population density. Enhancements in tolerance to crowding have been obtained around the world as the result of selecting the best yielding hybrids at dense stands over a wide testing area. However, the understanding of morpho-physiological determinants of maize endurance to the population density stress still needs improvement. This study aimed to evaluate the response of maize hybrids from different eras grown extensively in Brazil to the increase in plant sowing density and to identify agronomic traits that can account for the contrasting tolerance to high interplant competition. The trial was conducted in Lages, southern Brazil, during the growing seasons of 1999/2000 and 2000/2001. A split plot design was used. The double-cross hybrids Agroceres 12, Agroceres 303, and the single-cross hybrid Cargill 929, commercially released during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, respectively, were evaluated in the main plots. Four plant population densities were tested in the split plots: 25,000, 50,000, 75,000 and 100,000 plants ha −1 . Maize was sown in no-tillage system, having black oat as the preceding winter crop. Canopy architecture parameters, tassel dry matter accumulation, flower synchrony, grain yield and its components were evaluated. The older hybrids Agroceres 12 and Agroceres 303 out-yielded modern-hybrid C 929 at the lowest plant population density. The increase in plant population increased barrenness, lengthened the anthesis–silking interval and decreased kernel set per ear more drastically for the older than for the modern-hybrid. Consequently, the higher the number of plants per unit area, the greater the edge between grain yield and kernel number per area of C 929 in relation to its older counterparts. Current hybrid’s better performance at supraoptimum plant population densities was favored by three sets of traits. First, by lower dry matter partition to the tassel, stimulating a more balanced allometric relationship between male and female inflorescence. Second, by a more compact canopy architecture, with shorter plants, fewer and more upright leaves, enhancing solar radiation interception. Third, by low ear insertion to plant height ratio, promoting greater resistance to stalk lodging. These traits contributed to higher grain yield and positive response to higher densities in the modern-hybrid.

[1]  M. Cantarero,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Maize , 1999 .

[2]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize , 1996 .

[3]  A. M. Junior,et al.  Incremento na densidade de plantas: uma alternativa para aumentar o rendimento de grãos de milho em regiões de curta estação estival de crescimento , 2000 .

[4]  Gilber Argenta,et al.  Arranjo de plantas em milho: análise do estado-da-arte , 2001 .

[5]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[6]  V. Sadras,et al.  Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize , 2001 .

[7]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  Understanding maize–weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant , 2001 .

[8]  M. E. Otegui Kernel set and flower synchrony within the ear of maize: II. Plant population effects , 1997 .

[9]  J. Somsen,et al.  Rapid canopy closure for maize production in the northern US corn belt: Radiation-use efficiency and grain yield , 1997 .

[10]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid , 1997 .

[11]  L. M. Dwyer,et al.  Mathematical Characterization of Leaf Shape and Area of Maize Hybrids , 1999 .

[12]  M. E. Otegui,et al.  Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set , 2001 .

[13]  V. Sadras,et al.  Seed number as a function of growth. A comparative study in soybean, sunflower, and maize , 2001 .

[14]  Jean-Marcel Ribaut,et al.  The Role and Regulation of the Anthesis‐Silking Interval in Maize , 2000 .

[15]  D. Papakosta,et al.  Corn stalk traits related to lodging resistance in two soils of differing salinity. , 2000 .

[16]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Analysis of maize leaf photosynthesis under drought stress , 1992 .

[17]  D. D. Neto,et al.  Produção de milho , 2000 .

[18]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization , 1993 .

[19]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance , 1999 .

[20]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[21]  J. Hanway How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[22]  M. Otegui,et al.  Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation , 2001 .

[23]  L. C. Vahl,et al.  Recomendações de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. , 1987 .

[24]  Luis Sangoi,et al.  UNDERSTANDING PLANT DENSITY EFFECTS ON MAIZE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN IMPORTANT ISSUE TO MAXIMIZE GRAIN YIELD , 2001 .

[25]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Defoliation and Plant Density Effects on Maize Selected for Reduced Plant Height , 1993 .

[26]  L. Sangoi Aptidão dos campos de Lages (SC) para produção de milho em diferentes épocas de semeadura , 1993 .

[27]  R. J. Salvador,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PLANT HEIGHT AND OF LEAF NUMBER ON MAIZE PRODUCTION AT HIGH PLANT DENSITIES 1 , 1997 .

[28]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Maize Kernel Weight Response to Postflowering Source–Sink Ratio , 2001 .