Understanding Dynamics of Information Transmission in Drosophila melanogaster Using a Statistical Modeling Framework for Longitudinal Network Data (the RSiena Package)

Social learning – the transmission of behaviors through observation or interaction with conspecifics – can be viewed as a decision-making process driven by interactions among individuals. Animal group structures change over time and interactions among individuals occur in particular orders that may be repeated following specific patterns, change in their nature, or disappear completely. Here we used a stochastic actor-oriented model built using the RSiena package in R to estimate individual behaviors and their changes through time, by analyzing the dynamic of the interaction network of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster during social learning experiments. In particular, we re-analyzed an experimental dataset where uninformed flies, left free to interact with informed ones, acquired and later used information about oviposition site choice obtained by social interactions. We estimated the degree to which the uninformed flies had successfully acquired the information carried by informed individuals using the proportion of eggs laid by uninformed flies on the medium their conspecifics had been trained to favor. Regardless of the degree of information acquisition measured in uninformed individuals, they always received and started interactions more frequently than informed ones did. However, information was efficiently transmitted (i.e., uninformed flies predominantly laid eggs on the same medium informed ones had learn to prefer) only when the difference in contacts sent between the two fly types was small. Interestingly, we found that the degree of reciprocation, the tendency of individuals to form mutual connections between each other, strongly affected oviposition site choice in uninformed flies. This work highlights the great potential of RSiena and its utility in the studies of interaction networks among non-human animals.

[1]  C. Steglich,et al.  Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption , 2006 .

[2]  M. Tranmer,et al.  Using the relational event model (REM) to investigate the temporal dynamics of animal social networks , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  C. Heyes,et al.  SOCIAL LEARNING IN ANIMALS: CATEGORIES AND MECHANISMS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[4]  H. Whitehead,et al.  Group-specific dialects and geographical variation in coda repertoire in South Pacific sperm whales , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Time-Ordered Networks Reveal Limitations to Information Flow in Ant Colonies , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  Primate culture and social learning , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P. Richerson,et al.  • AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF SOCIAL LEARNING: THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATON , 2013 .

[9]  M. Dickinson,et al.  A New Chamber for Studying the Behavior of Drosophila , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  Hein de Vries,et al.  Article in Press G Model Social Networks Dynamics of Adolescent Friendship Networks and Smoking Behavior , 2022 .

[11]  Michael Schweinberger,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION FOR SOCIAL NETWORK DYNAMICS. , 2010, The annals of applied statistics.

[12]  C. Sueur,et al.  How social network structure affects decision-making in Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. Kerr,et al.  Socialization of Social Anxiety in Adolescent Crowds , 2011, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[14]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Aggression and courtship in Drosophila: pheromonal communication and sex recognition , 2013, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  V. Sharma,et al.  Social synchronization of circadian locomotor activity rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  C. Lumsden Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[17]  Odile Petit,et al.  Ecology of information: social transmission dynamics within groups of non-social insects , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  The contribution of extracurricular activities to adolescent friendships: new insights through social network analysis. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[19]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Ontogeny of Social Relations and Coalition Formation in Common Ravens (Corvus corax) , 2015, International journal of comparative psychology.

[20]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Social Learning : A Solution to Rogers ’ s Paradox of Nonadaptive Culture , 2007 .

[21]  M. Rohlfs Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae positively respond to fungal competitors , 2005, Frontiers in Zoology.

[22]  I. Coolen,et al.  Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .

[23]  Richard James,et al.  Temporal dynamics and network analysis , 2012 .

[24]  B. Galef,et al.  Parent-offspring interactions determine time and place of first ingestion of solid food by wild rat pups , 1971 .

[25]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[26]  Marcos Amaku,et al.  Infectious disease surveillance in animal movement networks: An approach based on the friendship paradox. , 2015, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[27]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[28]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[29]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[30]  W. Harris,et al.  Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[33]  D. Floreano,et al.  Mechanosensory Interactions Drive Collective Behaviour in Drosophila , 2014, Nature.

[34]  S. Feld Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Pietro Perona,et al.  High-throughput Ethomics in Large Groups of Drosophila , 2009, Nature Methods.

[36]  T. Snijders,et al.  Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data , 2007 .

[37]  Carsten Ullrich,et al.  Who Students Interact With? A Social Network Analysis Perspective on the Use of Twitter in Language Learning , 2010, EC-TEL.

[38]  F. Mery,et al.  Spread of Social Information and Dynamics of Social Transmission within Drosophila Groups , 2012, Current Biology.

[39]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Social structures depend on innate determinants and chemosensory processing in Drosophila , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Social Insects: A Model System for Network Dynamics , 2013 .

[41]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the Costs and Benefits of Social Information Use , 2011 .

[42]  M. Rohlfs,et al.  An evolutionary explanation of the aggregation model of species coexistence , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  E. van de Waal,et al.  Potent Social Learning and Conformity Shape a Wild Primate’s Foraging Decisions , 2013, Science.

[44]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[45]  Brian Skyrms,et al.  Evolution of signalling systems with multiple senders and receivers , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances , 2014 .

[47]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Conformity enhances network reciprocity in evolutionary social dilemmas , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[48]  G. Somero Linking biogeography to physiology: Evolutionary and acclimatory adjustments of thermal limits , 2005, Frontiers in Zoology.

[49]  Claudia Fichtel,et al.  Social networks in primates: smart and tolerant species have more efficient networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[50]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[51]  Erol Akçay,et al.  Social inheritance can explain the structure of animal social networks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[52]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[53]  Yong Deng,et al.  Weighted k-shell decomposition for complex networks based on potential edge weights , 2015 .

[54]  L. Chittka,et al.  A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees? , 2005, Current Biology.

[55]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[56]  R. Dukas,et al.  Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.