Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods

Purpose of reviewThis paper describes recent advances in perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods for assessing voice function. Recent findingsWe review advances from four major areas.Perceptual assessment: Speech-language pathologists are being encouraged to use the new consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice inventory for auditory-perceptual assessment of voice quality, and recent studies have provided new insights into listener reliability issues that have plagued subjective perceptual judgments of voice quality.Acoustic assessment: Progress is being made on the development of algorithms that are more robust for analyzing disordered voices, including the capability to extract voice quality-related measures from running speech segments.Aerodynamic assessment: New devices for measuring phonation threshold air pressures and air flows have the potential to serve as sensitive indices of glottal phonatory conditions, and recent developments in aeroacoustic theory may provide new insights into laryngeal sound production mechanisms.Endoscopic imaging: The increased light sensitivity of new ultra high-speed color digital video processors is enabling high-quality endoscopic imaging of vocal fold tissue motion at unprecedented image capture rates, which promises to provide new insights into the mechanisms of normal and disordered voice production. SummarySome of the recent research advances in voice function assessment could be more readily adopted into clinical practice, whereas others will require further development.

[1]  Shaheen N Awan,et al.  Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four‐factor acoustic model , 2006, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[2]  M. Döllinger,et al.  Model-based classification of nonstationary vocal fold vibrations. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Xin Chen,et al.  Automatic tracing of vocal-fold motion from high-speed digital images , 2006 .

[4]  Peter J Murphy,et al.  Noise estimation in voice signals using short-term cepstral analysis. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  Videokymography in Voice Disorders: What to Look For? , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  Chi Zhu,et al.  Automatic tracing of vocal-fold motion from high-speed digital images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Terri Treman Gerlach,et al.  Clinical Implementation of Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy: Challenges and Evolution , 2007, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[9]  M. S. Howe,et al.  Sound generated by aerodynamic sources near a deformable body, with application to voiced speech , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Michael S. Howe,et al.  Compact Green's functions extend the acoustic theory of speech production , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[11]  Edward Damrose,et al.  Functional analysis of voice using simultaneous high-speed imaging and acoustic recordings. , 2007, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[12]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure using Incomplete Airflow Interruption , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Peter J Murphy On first rahmonic amplitude in the analysis of synthesized aperiodic voice signals. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Classification of unilateral vocal fold paralysis by endoscopic digital high-speed recordings and inversion of a biomechanical model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  The minimum glottal airflow to initiate vocal fold oscillation. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Extracting Physiologically Relevant Parameters of Vocal Folds From High-Speed Video Image Series , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  J. Kreiman,et al.  When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Dependence of phonation threshold pressure on vocal tract acoustics and vocal fold tissue mechanics. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Anderson,et al.  Foresight in Laryngology and Laryngeal Surgery: A 2020 Vision , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[21]  Dimitar D Deliyski,et al.  Mucosal wave: a normophonic study across visualization techniques. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Acoustic analyses of sustained and running voices from patients with laryngeal pathologies. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[23]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure via Airflow Redirection , 2007, The Laryngoscope.