Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials.

A recent joint meeting was held on January 30, 2014, with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Cancer Institute (NCI), clinical scientists, imaging experts, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocate groups to discuss imaging endpoints for clinical trials in glioblastoma. This workshop developed a set of priorities and action items including the creation of a standardized MRI protocol for multicenter studies. The current document outlines consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol (BTIP), along with the scientific and practical justifications for these recommendations, resulting from a series of discussions between various experts involved in aspects of neuro-oncology neuroimaging for clinical trials. The minimum recommended sequences include: (i) parameter-matched precontrast and postcontrast inversion recovery-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo; (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo acquired after contrast injection and before postcontrast 3D T1-weighted images to control timing of images after contrast administration; (iii) precontrast, axial 2D T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; and (iv) precontrast, axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images. Recommended ranges of sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5 T and 3 T MR systems.

[1]  Timothy F Cloughesy,et al.  Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[2]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  K. Yamashita,et al.  3D Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence with Motion-Sensitized Driven-Equilibrium Preparation for Detection of Brain Metastases on 3T MR Imaging , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  J. Economou,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of several experimental and human malignant tumors. , 1973, Cancer research.

[5]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Yasuhiro Inoue,et al.  Localization and trafficking of membrane-bound MMPs , 2001 .

[7]  J. Marks,et al.  Prognostic significance of lesion size for glioblastoma multiforme. , 1979, Radiology.

[8]  S B Green,et al.  The prognostic importance of tumor size in malignant gliomas: a computed tomographic scan study by the Brain Tumor Cooperative Group. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  I. Tannock,et al.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. A. van der Laak,et al.  Quantitative analysis of microvascular changes in diffuse astrocytic neoplasms with increasing grade of malignancy. , 1998, Human pathology.

[12]  S. Holtås,et al.  Time-dependency in brain lesion enhancement with gadodiamide injection , 1997, Acta radiologica.

[13]  Benjamin M Ellingson,et al.  Recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab: contrast-enhanced T1-weighted subtraction maps improve tumor delineation and aid prediction of survival in a multicenter clinical trial. , 2014, Radiology.

[14]  C. Matula,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Enhancement of Brain Tumors at 3 Tesla Versus 1.5 Tesla , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[15]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2008 .

[16]  D. DeLong,et al.  Bidimensional measurements in brain tumors: assessment of interobserver variability. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. Lavin,et al.  Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors , 1980, Cancer.

[18]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  H. Kreisman,et al.  Problems in radiographic estimation of response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer , 1988, Cancer.

[20]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  K. Holl,et al.  A T1-weighted rapid three-dimensional gradient-echo technique (MP-RAGE) in preoperative MRI of intracranial tumours , 1996, Neuroradiology.

[22]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  Michael Weller,et al.  Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma--are we there yet? , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[25]  F Barkhof,et al.  Interobserver variability in the radiological assessment of response to chemotherapy in glioma , 2003, Neurology.

[26]  B. Escudier,et al.  Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  F. Ståhlberg,et al.  Brain lesion contrast in MR imaging , 1997, Acta radiologica.

[28]  Benjamin M Ellingson,et al.  Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[29]  W. Nitz,et al.  MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence--initial experience in the brain. , 1992, Radiology.

[30]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Emerging techniques and technologies in brain tumor imaging. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[31]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[32]  K. Aldape,et al.  Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  D. Medina,et al.  Relationship between hydration and proton nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times in tissues of tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing mice: implications for cancer detection. , 1974, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Impact of MRI head placement on glioma response assessment , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[36]  R. Damadian Tumor Detection by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1971, Science.

[37]  Walter J Curran,et al.  Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  K. Hopper,et al.  Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  Bradley J Erickson,et al.  Validation of neuroradiologic response assessment in gliomas: measurement by RECIST, two-dimensional, computer-assisted tumor area, and computer-assisted tumor volume methods. , 2006, Neuro-oncology.

[40]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  B. Condon,et al.  Measurement of tumor "size" in recurrent malignant glioma: 1D, 2D, or 3D? , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[42]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  M. Mrugala,et al.  Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. , 2009, Neurology.

[44]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Report of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and FDA clinical trials neuroimaging endpoint workshop (January 30, 2014, Bethesda MD). , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[45]  D. Atkinson,et al.  Three‐dimensional MR imaging and display of intracranial disease: Improvements with the MP‐RAGE sequence and gadolinium , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  L. Van den Hauwe,et al.  Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE of the brain. , 1996 .

[47]  J. Heidenreich,et al.  Quantitative contrast ratio comparison between T1 (TSE at 1.5T, FLAIR at 3T), magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo and subtraction imaging at 1.5T and 3T. , 2013, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[48]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. , 2002, Radiology.

[49]  C. Jack,et al.  Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) , 2005, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[50]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Brain Tumor Enhancement in MR Imaging at 3 Tesla: Comparison of SNR and CNR Gain Using TSE and GRE Techniques , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[51]  P. M. Parizel,et al.  Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE of the brain , 2005, Neuroradiology.

[52]  P. LaViolette,et al.  Validation of functional diffusion maps (fDMs) as a biomarker for human glioma cellularity , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[53]  P S Albert,et al.  Comparison of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements of childhood brain tumors. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[54]  Owen Carmichael,et al.  Update on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[55]  K. Aldape,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  P. Black,et al.  Microvessel density is a prognostic indicator for patients with astroglial brain tumors , 1996, Cancer.

[57]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[58]  L. H. Bennett,et al.  Recognition of Cancer in vivo by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1972, Science.

[59]  G A Lloyd,et al.  Subtraction gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance for head and neck imaging. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[60]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[61]  J W Sayre,et al.  Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma treated with selective intra-arterial chemotherapy. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[62]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[63]  V M Runge,et al.  Clinical comparison of three‐dimensional MP‐RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[64]  Rémy Guillevin,et al.  Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.