Of Humean Bondage

There are many ways of attaching two objects together: for example, they can be connected, linked, tied or bound together; and the connection, link, tie or bind can be made of chain, rope, or cement. Every one of these binding methods has been used as a metaphor for causation. What is the real significance of these metaphors? They express a commitment to a certain way of thinking about causation, summarized in the following thesis: ‘In any concrete situation, there is an objective fact of the matter as to whether two events are in fact bound by the causal relation. It is the aim of philosophical inquiry to analyze this objective relation.’ Through a variety of examples, I hope to cast doubt on this seemingly innocuous thesis. The problem lies not with the word ‘objective’, but with the word ‘the’. The goal of a philosophical account of causation should not be to capture the causal relation, but rather to capture the many ways in which the events of the world can be bound together. 1 The metaphors 2 Unpacking the metaphors 3 Theories of causation 4 The two assassins 5 The birth control pills 6 The smoker‐protector gene 7 The bicycle thief 8 Further examples 8.1 Indeterminism 8.2 Probability‐lowering causes 8.3 Parts vs wholes 8.4 Symmetric overdetermination 8.5 Delayers 8.6 Causation by omission 8.7 Double prevention/disconnection 8.8 Preemptive prevention 8.9 Quantitative variables 9 Conclusion

[1]  J. Gerring.  Causation , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed In Equations and Graphs , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  Causal Generalizations and Good Advice , 2001 .

[4]  Jonathan Schaffer,et al.  Causation by Disconnection , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[5]  D. Lewis.  Causation as Influence , 2000 .

[6]  Ned Hall.  Causation and the Price of Transitivity , 2000 .

[7]  L. A. Paul,et al.  Keeping Track of the Time: Emending the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation , 1998 .

[8]  Christopher Hitchcock,et al.  The role of contrast in causal and explanatory claims , 1996, Synthese.

[9]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  Farewell to Binary Causation , 1996, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[10]  Michael McDermott,et al.  Redundant Causation , 1995, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[11]  W. Salmon.  Causality without Counterfactuals , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[12]  John W. Carroll,et al.  Laws of nature: Index , 1994 .

[13]  Christopher Read Hitchcock,et al.  A generalized probabilistic theory of causal relevance , 1993, Synthese.

[14]  S. Yablo.  Cause and essence , 1992, Synthese.

[15]  Phil Dowe,et al.  Wesley Salmon's Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory , 1992, Philosophy of Science.

[16]  J. Woodward,et al.  Supervenience and Singular Causal Claims , 1991 .

[17]  John Dupré,et al.  Probabilistic Causality: A Rejoinder to Ellery Eells , 1990, Philosophy of Science.

[18]  Michael Tooley,et al.  Causation: A Realist Approach. , 1990 .

[19]  Adam Morton,et al.  Causation: A Realist Approach , 1989 .

[20]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[21]  Carol E. Cleland,et al.  Events and their Names. , 1988 .

[22]  D. Lewis.  Philosophical Papers: Volume II , 1987 .

[23]  Ellery Eells,et al.  Probabilistic Causality: Reply to John Dupré , 1987, Philosophy of Science.

[24]  John Dupré,et al.  Probabilistic Causality Emancipated , 1984 .

[25]  B. Skyrms.  EPR: Lessons for Metaphysics , 1984 .

[26]  E. Sober.  Two Concepts of Cause , 1984, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[27]  E. Eells,et al.  Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity , 1983, Philosophy of Science.

[28]  N. Cartwright.  Causal Laws and Effective Strategies , 1979 .

[29]  David Lewis.  Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow , 1979 .

[30]  Fred I. Dretske,et al.  REFERRING TO EVENTS , 1977 .

[31]  G. Hesslow.  Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality , 1976, Philosophy of Science.

[32]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[33]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[34]  Sir Ronald A. Fisher.  Smoking: The Cancer Controversy , 1960 .

[35]  B. Russell.  I.—On the Notion of Cause , 1913 .

[36]  Christopher Hitchcock,et al.  Do All and Only Causes Raise the Probabilities of Effects , 2004 .

[37]  H. Beebee.  Causing and Nothingness , 2004 .

[38]  David B. Hume,et al.  An Equiry Concerning Human Understanding , 1999 .

[39]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  Causal Knowledge: That Great Guide of Human Life , 1998 .

[40]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .

[41]  P. Kitcher.  Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world , 1989 .

[42]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  The chances of explanation , 1989 .

[43]  Jonathan Bennett,et al.  Event Causation: The Counterfactual Analysis , 1987 .

[44]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[45]  J. Earman,et al.  The Cement Of The Universe , 1974 .

[46]  H. Reichenbach,et al.  The Direction of Time. , 1958 .

[47]  B. Baldwin,et al.  An Essay on Metaphysics , 1941, Nature.

[48]  John Venn,et al.  The Logic Of Chance , 1888 .

[49]  Causality : Models , Reasoning , and Inference , 2022 .