Teaching at Bauhaus: improving design capacities of creative people? From modular to generic creativity in design-driven innovation

In this paper we analyse teaching at Bauhaus (1919-1933), through the courses of Itten and Klee. We show that these courses not only aimed at teaching the styles. They aimed at increasing students creative design capacities and at providing them techniques to create their own style, in the sense of being able to be generically creative - ie be creative on as many languages as possible. The analyses of the two courses leads to identify two critical features to get a generic creative design capacity: 1-A knowledge structure that is characterized by non-determinism and non-independence; 2-A genesis process that helps to progressively "superimpose" languages on the object in a robust way. These features are strongly different from the knowledge structure and design process of Engineering Systematic Design. We finally show that these features actually correspond to two sufficient conditions for a mathematical model of sets to be "forced" (Cohen 1964) ie to lead to the creation of a new, extended model of sets that is generically different from the original one and still based on the law of this original one. This underlines the deep similarity between the logic of artistic creation and the logic of mathematical creation.

[1]  P. J. Cohen.  Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis , 1966 .

[2]  David Wang,et al.  Holding Creativity Together: A Sociological Theory of the Design Professions , 2009, Design Issues.

[3]  M. Gaughan.  The Werkbund: Design Theory and Mass Culture before the First World War , 1997 .

[4]  Helen d. Gardner.  Art Through the Ages: An Introduction To Its History & Significance , 1936 .

[5]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design as Forcing: Deepening the Foundations of C-K Theory , 2007 .

[6]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[7]  Johannes Itten,et al.  The art of color , 1961 .

[8]  Barbara Jaffee,et al.  Before the New Bauhaus: From Industrial Drawing to Art and Design Education in Chicago , 2005, Design Issues.

[9]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[10]  Webb Keane,et al.  Semiotics and the social analysis of material things , 2003 .

[11]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[12]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[13]  Paul Cohen,et al.  The Discovery of Forcing , 2002 .

[14]  Raimonda Riccini,et al.  History from Things: Notes on the History of Industrial Design , 1998 .

[15]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .