Balancing fluid and cemented routines in a digital workplace

Abstract Advanced workplace technologies are increasingly used alongside traditional enterprise software packages (such as enterprise resource planning) in the workplace. However, we have only limited understanding of how different kinds of technologies are used to dynamically shape work routines and fluidity in a digital workplace. We conducted an in-depth six-year study of the use of enterprise resource planning (ERP) system by a large information technology service provider company. The company used the system to manage its global staffing processes. We explored how the users of this system sought to achieve the fluidity needed to do their work. Our findings show that users balance two patterns of routine performance through different technologies with varying degrees of malleability: one to generate fluidity and another to generate stability. We call this process ‘generative balancing’. Our research contributes to the literature on workplace technologies and ERP use by providing insights into how the use of technologies with different degrees of malleability helps to craft digital workspaces and enables users to deal with tensions between accomplishing local-level performance and realizing corporate-level strategic intents.

[1]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Place and Institutional Work , 2015 .

[3]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[4]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routines Transfer , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Thomas Hess,et al.  How Chief Digital Officers Promote the Digital Transformation of their Companies , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Aimee Pernsteiner,et al.  Control or chaos: impact of workarounds on internal controls , 2018 .

[8]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  A Paradox of Progressive Saturation: The Changing Nature of Improvisation over Time in a Systems Development Project , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[13]  Ioannis Ignatiadis,et al.  The impact of enterprise systems on organizational resilience , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  J OrlikowskiWanda,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Digital Work: A Research Agenda , 2016 .

[17]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[18]  J. Whyte,et al.  Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects' , 2009 .

[19]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Entanglements of creative agency and digital technology: A sociomaterial study of computer game development , 2019 .

[20]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[21]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Julien Malaurent,et al.  Reconciling global and local needs: a canonical action research project to deal with workarounds , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead , 2010 .

[24]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[25]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[27]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[28]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[29]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA's Enterprise Information System , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[30]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[33]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Exploring social network interactions in enterprise systems: the role of virtual co‐presence , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  Dawna Drum,et al.  Workarounds in an SAP environment: impacts on accounting information quality , 2017 .

[35]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Youngjin Yoo Digital Materiality and the Emergence of an Evolutionary Science of the Artificial , 2012 .

[38]  Jeremy Aroles,et al.  Rethinking Stability and Change in the Study of Organizational Routines: Difference and Repetition in a Newspaper-Printing Factory , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[39]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[40]  Luciana D'Adderio Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[41]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[42]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  The dynamics of contextual forces of ERP implementation , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Cecilia Rossignoli,et al.  My choice, your problem? Mandating IT use in large organisational networks , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[44]  J. Gerring Case Study Research: Principles and Practices , 2006 .

[45]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .