Target detection distances under different road lighting intensities

PurposeRoad lighting illuminates road surface and surrounding areas of objects on a road, while car headlights illuminate vertical objects on a road. The goal of the study was to investigate the interaction between road lighting and car headlights at target detection distance.MethodTarget detection distances under different road lighting intensities and car headlights were studied with and without glare from an oncoming car. Dimmable high-pressure sodium lamps with three lighting levels 49, 71 and 100% (3557, 5179 and 7252 lm) were used. Test drivers had to detect a small uniform standard target standing vertically on the straight road.ResultsIn the absence of glare (low beam car headlights), road lighting intensity levels of 100 and 49% provided comparable detection distances, while at 71% of road lighting intensity visibility was the lowest. The target was seen in negative or positive contrast in 100% of road lighting. In 71% of road lighting, the target was detected in positive contrast. While, in 49% of road lighting target was seen in negative contrast. There was a significant difference in detection distances under different road lighting intensities when there was no glare from the oncoming car. The significance main effect was between 49 and 71% of road lighting intensities. In addition, no significant differences in the effect of road lighting intensities could be found under glare from the oncoming car. In the presence of glare from the oncoming car, targets were always in negative contrast. Both road lighting and car headlights are associated with detection distances.ConclusionThe results of these experiments can give new insight to the development of intelligent road lighting considering the combined effect of road lighting and car headlights. The results provide useful insight to dim the lighting in order to save energy without impairing the detection of objects.

[1]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  Marjukka Eloholma,et al.  The Contribution of Vehicle Headlights to Visibility of Targets in Road Lighting Environments , 2008 .

[3]  ROBERT H. WORTMAN,et al.  Evaluation of Driver Behavior at Signalized Intersections , 2017 .

[4]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[5]  D. Massie,et al.  Analysis of accident rates by age, gender, and time of day based on the 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. Final report , 1993 .

[6]  B. Duval Commission internationale de l’éclairage (CIE) , 2001, Optique Photonique.

[7]  I G Pallikaris,et al.  Road traffic casualties: understanding the night-time death toll , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[8]  A Bacelar The contribution of vehicle lights in urban and peripheral urban environments , 2004 .

[9]  Iisakki Kosonen,et al.  The effects of dimmable road lighting: A comparison of measured and perceived visibility , 2016 .

[10]  J. M. Christian Bastien,et al.  The effect of the driving activity on target detection as a function of the visibility level: Implications for road lighting , 2010 .

[11]  John D. Bullough,et al.  A method for assessing the visibility benefits of roadway lighting , 2010 .

[12]  Ronald B Gibbons,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Spectral Power Distribution on Driver Performance , 2015 .

[13]  K Rumar,et al.  Visible distances and safe approach speeds for night driving. , 1968, Ergonomics.

[14]  Alexis Bacelar The Influence of Dimming in Road Lighting on the Visibility of Drivers , 2005 .

[15]  Peter Boyce Lighting for Driving: Roads, Vehicles, Signs, and Signals , 2008 .

[16]  P Garvey,et al.  COUNTERMEASURES FOR REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF HEADLIGHT GLARE , 2001 .

[17]  T Assum,et al.  Risk compensation--the case of road lighting. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.