Including αs1casein gene information in genomic evaluations of French dairy goats

BackgroundGenomic best linear unbiased prediction methods assume that all markers explain the same fraction of the genetic variance and do not account effectively for genes with major effects such as the αs1casein polymorphism in dairy goats. In this study, we investigated methods to include the available αs1casein genotype effect in genomic evaluations of French dairy goats.MethodsFirst, the αs1casein genotype was included as a fixed effect in genomic evaluation models based only on bucks that were genotyped at the αs1casein locus. Less than 1 % of the females with phenotypes were genotyped at the αs1casein gene. Thus, to incorporate these female phenotypes in the genomic evaluation, two methods that allowed for this large number of missing αs1casein genotypes were investigated. Probabilities for each possible αs1casein genotype were first estimated for each female of unknown genotype based on iterative peeling equations. The second method is based on a multiallelic gene content approach. For each model tested, we used three datasets each divided into a training and a validation set: (1) two-breed population (Alpine + Saanen), (2) Alpine population, and (3) Saanen population.ResultsThe αs1casein genotype had a significant effect on milk yield, fat content and protein content. Including an αs1casein effect in genetic and genomic evaluations based only on male known αs1casein genotypes improved accuracies (from 6 to 27 %). In genomic evaluations based on all female phenotypes, the gene content approach performed better than the other tested methods but the improvement in accuracy was only slightly better (from 1 to 14 %) than that of a genomic model without the αs1casein effect.ConclusionsIncluding the αs1casein effect in a genomic evaluation model for French dairy goats is possible and useful to improve accuracy. Difficulties in predicting the genotypes for ungenotyped animals limited the improvement in accuracy of the obtained estimated breeding values.

[1]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Effets du polymorphisme de la caséine αs1 caprine sur les performances laitières: analyse intradescendance de boucs de race Alpine , 1994, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  A. Malafosse,et al.  Implementation of marker-assisted selection in French dairy cattle. , 2002 .

[3]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Marker-assisted breeding value estimation for mastitis resistance in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Genetic parameters of dairy traits in the Alpine and Saanen goat breeds , 1999, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[5]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[6]  M. T. Rodrigues,et al.  Genetic diversity between herds of Alpine and Saanen dairy goats and the naturalized Brazilian Moxotó breed , 2006 .

[7]  R. Ulloa-Arvizu,et al.  Genetic polymorphism of the αs1-casein locus in five populations of goats from Mexico , 2008 .

[8]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[9]  N Gengler,et al.  Accuracy of prediction of gene content in large animal populations and its use for candidate gene detection and genetic evaluation. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  B. Hayes,et al.  Effects on Production Traits of Haplotypes Among Casein Genes in Norwegian Goats and Evidence for a Site of Preferential Recombination , 2006, Genetics.

[11]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. , 2009, Genetics research.

[12]  D. Kültz,et al.  Prevalence of alphas1-casein genotypes in American dairy goats. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[13]  F. Remeuf,et al.  From gene to cheese: polymorphism of αs1-casein in goat milk, its effects and development. , 1994 .

[14]  M. Mahé,et al.  A Mendelian polymorphism underlying quantitative variations of goat αs1-casein , 1987, Génétique, sélection, évolution.

[15]  M Quinton,et al.  Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[16]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Influence du locus de la caséine αs1 sur les performances laitières et les paramètres génétiques des chèvres de race Alpine , 1995, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[17]  R. Fernando,et al.  The effect of using genealogy-based haplotypes for genomic prediction , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[18]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of Genomic Selection Using Different Methods to Define Haplotypes , 2008, Genetics.

[19]  E. J. Williams The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .

[20]  T. Gipson PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS : INBREEDING IN DAIRY GOATS AND ITS EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION , 2002 .

[21]  B. Bed’hom,et al.  Impact of strong selection for the PrP major gene on genetic variability of four French sheep breeds (Open Access publication) , 2008, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[22]  G Banos,et al.  Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  R. C. Elston,et al.  An efficient algorithm to compute the posterior genotypic distribution for every member of a pedigree without loops , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[24]  P. Croiseau Extension to Haplotypes of Genomic Evaluation Algorithms , 2014 .

[25]  Didier Boichard,et al.  GSE is now an open access journal published by BioMed Central , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[26]  M. Selvaggi,et al.  Major proteins in goat milk: an updated overview on genetic variability , 2014, Molecular Biology Reports.

[27]  P. Martin,et al.  Effects of the FecL major gene in the Lacaune meat sheep population , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[28]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) , 2002 .

[29]  M. T. Rodrigues,et al.  Polymorphism of alphas1-casein gene in a dairy goat herd in the southeastern region of Brazil. , 2009 .

[30]  Ben J Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[31]  Jun Wang,et al.  Design and Characterization of a 52K SNP Chip for Goats , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  M Grossman,et al.  Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction , 1989, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[33]  C. Leroux,et al.  Real-time RT-PCR and cDNA macroarray to study the impact of the genetic polymorphism at the alphas1-casein locus on the expression of genes in the goat mammary gland during lactation. , 2003, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[34]  Andrés Legarra,et al.  Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[35]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  H. Kang,et al.  Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[37]  I Misztal,et al.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  D. Boichard,et al.  National genetic evaluations in dairy sheep and goats in France , 2011 .

[39]  F. Nicholas Discovery, validation and delivery of DNA markers , 2006 .

[40]  Zulma G Vitezica,et al.  Using genotype probabilities in survival analysis: a scrapie case , 2005, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[41]  N Gengler,et al.  A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[42]  M. McMullen,et al.  A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[43]  C. Schrooten,et al.  Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[44]  C. Robert-Granié,et al.  Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population , 2014, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[45]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Introgression of a major QTL from an inferior into a superior population using genomic selection , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[46]  C. Robert-Granié,et al.  A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.