Interest Groups, the Media, and Policy Debate Formation: An Analysis of Message Structure, Rhetoric, and Source Cues

We propose an interactive model of public policy debate formation that highlights the dependent yet competitive relationship between the media and pressure groups in structuring policy messages and issue rhetoric. To test our model we examine the evolution of the abortion debate in the print media using measures of message format and related contextual cues to determine the effectiveness of the media versus interest group players in generating favorable issue messages and controlling policy rhetoric. We find that the media both report issue news and advocate unique policy messages, and that inter- and intrainterest group competition in structuring issue information is cyclical and often related more to journalistic norms than to actual pressure group strength.

[1]  D. Kinder,et al.  Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks , 1990 .

[2]  M. Goggin,et al.  Understanding the New Politics of Abortion , 1993, American politics quarterly.

[3]  S. K. Houseknecht,et al.  Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood , 1985 .

[4]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[5]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Constructing the political spectacle , 1989 .

[6]  Richard W. Davis.  The Press and American Politics: The New Mediator , 1991 .

[7]  L. Tribe.  Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes , 1990 .

[8]  Charles D. Elder,et al.  Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building , 1975 .

[9]  P. J. Conover,et al.  Battle Cries on the Family Front@@@The War Over the Family: Capturing the Middle Ground.@@@The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment.@@@Feminism and the New Right: Conflict Over the American Family. , 1984 .

[10]  David L. Altheide,et al.  The Credibility of Protest , 1972 .

[11]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Movements and Media as Interacting Systems , 1993 .

[12]  Stephen Hess,et al.  The Washington Reporters , 1981 .

[13]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action , 1987 .

[14]  E. E. Schattschneider.  The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America , 1960 .

[15]  Nayda Terkildsen,et al.  How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women's Movement , 1997 .

[16]  J. Outshoorn,et al.  The new politics of abortion , 1986 .

[17]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[18]  J. Boles.  The Politics of the Equal Rights Amendment: Conflict and the Decision Process , 1980 .

[19]  D. O’brien,et al.  Abortion and American politics , 1993 .

[20]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[21]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Faye Ginsburg,et al.  Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community , 1989 .

[23]  R. Klatch.  Women of the New Right , 1986 .

[24]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy , 1980 .

[25]  Gaye Tuchman.  Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .