Shear viscosity for fluids of hard ellipsoids: A kinetic theory and molecular dynamics study

The frequency‐dependent shear viscosity η(ω) and the shear‐orientation coupling parameter R are calculated for fluids of hard prolate ellipsoids of revolution, using kinetic theory and molecular dynamics. Two effects which contribute to the shear viscosity are considered. First, the D ∞h particle symmetry influences both the spectrum of the collision operator and the multi‐Lorentzian decay of η(ω). These multiple decays are most important at low densities for elongated particles. Second, coupling between the stress tensor and the collective molecular orientation leads to a minimum in η(ω) between its zero‐frequency limit η and its infinite‐frequency plateau value η∞. At densities approaching the transition to a nematic phase, the zero‐frequency shear viscosity is predicted to be dominated by its infinite‐frequency plateau value, i.e., η/η∞∼1. Molecular dynamics simulations, extended to longer times than those previously reported, confirm the existence of the dip in η(ω) and the importance of stress‐orientation coupling in determining the value of η. Discrepancies previously thought to exist between simulation and theory are attributed to this coupling between the stress and slow collective reorientation; we now obtain good agreement between simulation and theory at low and moderate densities. The kinetic theory predicts the position of the dip quite well, but underestimates its magnitude for elongated particles at medium and high densities. The theory also predicts a weak density dependence of the shear‐orientation coupling parameter R, and a decrease in this parameter with increasing elongation, whereas the simulations show a steady increase in R with both density and elongation. Moreover, the ratio η/η∞ falls below unity, rather than approaching unity, as the density increases, in several of the cases studied. The Stokes–Einstein relation and the Stokes–Einstein–Debye relation are investigated, and a consistent picture emerges of a crossover between a regime in which kinetic theory is accurate (at low density and elongation) to one in which a hydrodynamic description with slip boundary conditions applies (at high density and elongation). The change to hydrodynamic behavior is more apparent for the rotational motion than for the translational motion.

[1]  G. T. Evans,et al.  Dynamics in Polyatomic Fluids: A Kinetic Theory Approach , 1986 .

[2]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The Boltzmann equation for a polyatomic gas , 1969 .

[3]  P. Mazur,et al.  Non-equilibrium thermodynamics, , 1963 .

[4]  D. Hoffman Collision Integrals of a Gas of Rigid Convex Molecules , 1969 .

[5]  D. Evans Erratum: Equilibrium fluctuation expressions for the wave-vector- and frequency-dependent shear viscosity , 1981 .

[6]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Hard convex body fluids , 1993 .

[7]  H. Mori Transport, Collective Motion, and Brownian Motion , 1965 .

[8]  B. Alder,et al.  Velocity Autocorrelations for Hard Spheres , 1967 .

[9]  M. P. Allen,et al.  Transport properties of the hard ellipsoid fluid , 1993 .

[10]  G. T. Evans Transport coefficients of nonspherical hard bodies : a kinetic theory approach , 1991 .

[11]  T. G. Cowling,et al.  The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 1939 .

[12]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[13]  D. Kivelson,et al.  A comprehensive light scattering study of a liquid composed of symmetric top molecules , 1982 .

[14]  C. F. Curtiss,et al.  KINETIC THEORY OF NONSPHERICAL MOLECULES. V , 1956 .

[15]  Mason,et al.  Equation of state for a fluid of hard convex bodies in any number of dimensions. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[16]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Kinetic theory of the depolarized light scattering R parameter. I. Formal theory , 1984 .

[17]  G. T. Evans,et al.  Self-diffusion in isotropic and nematic phases of highly elongated hard particles , 1993 .

[18]  M. P. Allen,et al.  Theory of depolarized light scattering , 1981 .

[19]  P. Madden,et al.  LIGHT SCATTERING STUDIES OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS , 1980 .

[20]  G. T. Evans,et al.  A critique of slip and stick hydrodynamics for ellipsoidal bodies , 1993 .

[21]  A. Masters,et al.  A comparison between kinetic theory and affine transformation theory for self diffusion in a fluid of aligned hard spheroids , 1994 .

[22]  Allen,et al.  Diffusion coefficient increases with density in hard ellipsoid liquid crystals. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[23]  D. W. Rebertus,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of a fluid of hard spherocylinders , 1977 .

[24]  B. Alder,et al.  Studies in Molecular Dynamics. VIII. The Transport Coefficients for a Hard-Sphere Fluid , 1970 .

[25]  D. Kivelson,et al.  VH light scattering from triphenyl phosphite: Coupling of shear modes to molecular rotation , 1975 .

[26]  Talbot,et al.  Accuracy of Enskog theory for rotational versus translational motion: A molecular-dynamics study. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[27]  I. R. Mcdonald,et al.  Theory of simple liquids , 1998 .

[28]  M. P. Allen,et al.  Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation and generalized hydrodynamics of transverse modes in molecular fluids , 1981 .

[29]  Holian,et al.  Shear-rate dependence of the viscosity of the Lennard-Jones liquid at the triple point. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[30]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation using hard particles , 1989 .