Characteristics and impact of interventions to support healthcare providers’ compliance with guideline recommendations for breast cancer: a systematic literature review

[1]  G. Úrrutia,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. , 2021, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[2]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  S. Ramsey,et al.  A pilot study to increase adherence to ASCO Choosing Wisely recommendations for breast cancer surveillance at community clinics. , 2020 .

[5]  I. Ricci-Cabello,et al.  Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries , 2020, BMC Health Services Research.

[6]  K. Schmitz,et al.  Implementing Strength after Breast Cancer (SABC) in outpatient rehabilitation clinics: mapping clinician survey data onto key implementation outcomes , 2020, Implementation Science Communications.

[7]  Brigitte Séroussi,et al.  Implementation of an ontological reasoning to support the guideline-based management of primary breast cancer patients in the DESIREE project , 2020, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[8]  M. Brouwers,et al.  Effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies on health care professionals’ behaviour and patient outcomes in the cancer care context: a systematic review , 2020, Implementation Science.

[9]  I. Ricci-Cabello,et al.  Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review , 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  C. Garritty,et al.  Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  B. Stuart,et al.  Utilization of Screening Mammograms in the Medicare Population Before and After the Affordable Care Act Implementation , 2018, Journal of aging and health.

[12]  S. Straus,et al.  How do clinicians use implementation tools to apply breast cancer screening guidelines to practice? , 2018, Implementation Science.

[13]  J. Landercasper,et al.  A Strategy for Changing Adherence to National Guidelines for Decreasing Laboratory Testing for Early Breast Cancer Patients. , 2018, WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin.

[14]  L. Potters,et al.  Implementation and utilization of hypofractionation for breast cancer , 2018, Advances in radiation oncology.

[15]  A. Trentham-Dietz,et al.  Contribution of Breast Cancer to Overall Mortality for US Women , 2018, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  M. V. van Oijen,et al.  Evaluation of Guideline Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands: A Survey Among Medical Oncologists by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group , 2017, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[17]  Rachel S Dean,et al.  Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) , 2016, BMJ Open.

[18]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[19]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Tools developed and disseminated by guideline producers to promote the uptake of their guidelines. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Sustainability of professionals’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: a systematic review , 2015, BMJ Open.

[21]  J. Peabody,et al.  Using Vignettes to Measure and Encourage Adherence to Clinical Pathways in a Quality-Based Oncology Network: An Early Report on the Moffitt Oncology Network Initiative. , 2015, Managed care.

[22]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Update on breast cancer risk prediction and prevention , 2015, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[23]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Health information technology: use it well, or don't! Findings from the use of a decision support system for breast cancer management , 2014, AMIA.

[24]  Andreas Seyfang,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of an Asbru-based decision support system for adjuvant treatment in breast cancer , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[25]  D. Querleu,et al.  Adherence to Guidelines in Gynecologic Cancer Surgery , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[26]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Growing Literature, Stagnant Science? Systematic Review, Meta-Regression and Cumulative Analysis of Audit and Feedback Interventions in Health Care , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Promoting quality and evidence-based care in early-stage breast cancer follow-up. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk,et al.  Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[30]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Which Patients may benefit from the Use of a Decision Support System to Improve Compliance of Physician Decisions with Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study with Breast Cancer involving Data Mining , 2013, MedInfo.

[31]  J Bouaud,et al.  Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  M. Kastner,et al.  Applying the Knowledge to Action Framework to Plan a Strategy for Implementing Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines: an Interprofessional Perspective , 2013, Journal of Cancer Education.

[33]  Timothy W. Smith,et al.  Is Medical Home Enrollment Associated With Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Follow-up Care Among Low-Income Breast Cancer Survivors? , 2013, Medical care.

[34]  L. K. Bartholomew,et al.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review , 2013, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[35]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Cancer care Ontario guideline recommendations for hormone receptor testing in breast cancer. , 2012, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[36]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  L. Veerbeek,et al.  Enhancing the quality of care for patients with breast cancer: seven years of experience with a Dutch auditing system. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[39]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  A. Stang.  Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses , 2010, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[42]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Using model checking for critiquing based on clinical guidelines , 2009, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[43]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  J. Mold,et al.  Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study , 2008, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[45]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Supporting multidisciplinary staff meetings for guideline-based breast cancer management: a study with OncoDoc2 , 2007, AMIA.

[47]  M. Clemons,et al.  Baseline radiological staging in primary breast cancer: impact of educational interventions on adherence to published guidelines. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[48]  J. Westfall,et al.  Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. , 2007, JAMA.

[49]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[50]  M. Desai,et al.  Effectiveness of academic detailing on breast cancer screening among primary care physicians in an underserved community. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[51]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  Luke Vale,et al.  Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. , 2006, Journal of general internal medicine.

[53]  L. Green,et al.  Translation of research into practice: why we can't "just do it". , 2005, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[54]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[56]  C. Bahtsevani,et al.  Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[57]  E. Paskett,et al.  Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older. , 2004, Health education research.

[58]  Michelle L. Klosterman,et al.  Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[59]  B. Fervers,et al.  A controlled ‘before-after’ study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[60]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing Provider Behavior: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2001, Medical care.

[61]  C. Messina,et al.  An educational approach to improving physician breast cancer screening practices and counseling skills. , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[62]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  ONCODOC: a successful experiment of computer-supported guideline development and implementation in the treatment of breast cancer , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[63]  P. Craft,et al.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: a community‐based audit of breast cancer treatment , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[64]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[65]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. , 1999, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[66]  A. Hillman,et al.  Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[67]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[68]  J. Lemkau,et al.  Enhancing mammography referral in primary care. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[69]  D. Lane,et al.  Effect of continuing medical education and cost reduction on physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines. , 1991, The Journal of family practice.

[70]  C. Chambers,et al.  Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[71]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2019, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[72]  Pierre Durieux,et al.  Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[73]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Physicians' Attitudes Towards the Advice of a Guideline-Based Decision Support System: A Case Study With OncoDoc2 in the Management of Breast Cancer Patients , 2015, MedInfo.

[74]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Patient clinical profiles associated with physician non-compliance despite the use of a guideline-based decision support system: a case study with OncoDoc2 using data mining techniques , 2012, AMIA.

[75]  P. Pluye,et al.  Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. , 2012, International journal of nursing studies.

[76]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Revisiting the EBM decision model to formalize non-compliance with computerized CPGs: results in the management of breast cancer with OncoDoc2. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[77]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines we can trust , 2011 .

[78]  R. Grol,et al.  Adherence to the guidelines of the CCCE in the treatment of node-positive breast cancer patients. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[79]  J. Lord,et al.  The Delta project: increasing breast cancer screening among rural minority and older women by targeting rural healthcare providers. , 2003, Oncology nursing forum.

[80]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[81]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  Impact of site-specific customizations on physician compliance with guidelines. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[82]  Jacques Bouaud,et al.  A Before-After Study Using OncoDoc, a Guideline-Based Decision Support-System on Breast Cancer Management: Impact upon Physician Prescribing Behaviour , 2001, MedInfo.