Biology Undergraduates’ Misconceptions about Genetic Drift

This study explores biology undergraduates’ misconceptions about genetic drift. We use qualitative and quantitative methods to describe students’ definitions, identify common misconceptions, and examine differences before and after instruction on genetic drift. We identify and describe five overarching categories that include 16 distinct misconceptions about genetic drift. The accuracy of students’ conceptions ranges considerably, from responses indicating only superficial, if any, knowledge of any aspect of evolution to responses indicating knowledge of genetic drift but confusion about the nuances of genetic drift. After instruction, a significantly greater number of responses indicate some knowledge of genetic drift (p = 0.005), but 74.6% of responses still contain at least one misconception. We conclude by presenting a framework that organizes how students’ conceptions of genetic drift change with instruction. We also articulate three hypotheses regarding undergraduates’ conceptions of evolution in general and genetic drift in particular. We propose that: 1) students begin with undeveloped conceptions of evolution that do not recognize different mechanisms of change; 2) students develop more complex, but still inaccurate, conceptual frameworks that reflect experience with vocabulary but still lack deep understanding; and 3) some new misconceptions about genetic drift emerge as students comprehend more about evolution.

[1]  Anit Raja Banerjee,et al.  An Introduction to Conservation Genetics , 2010, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[2]  Evelyn Fox Keller,et al.  Keywords in evolutionary biology , 1994 .

[3]  R. Nehm,et al.  Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection , 2007 .

[4]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[5]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[6]  D. Kelemen,et al.  The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adults , 2009, Cognition.

[7]  Mary J. Leonard,et al.  Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense Except in the Light of DNA , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[9]  M. Lecoutre,et al.  PEOPLE’S INTUITIONS ABOUT RANDOMNESS AND PROBABILITY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2006 .

[10]  Jane P. Ellis,et al.  A Proposal for a Common Minimal Topic Set in Introductory Biology Courses for Majors , 2011 .

[11]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions , 1998 .

[12]  Joanna Masel,et al.  Rethinking Hardy–Weinberg and genetic drift in undergraduate biology , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  Minsu Ha,et al.  Item Feature Effects in Evolution Assessment. , 2011 .

[14]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education , 1983 .

[15]  Judy Perry,et al.  Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[16]  Joanna Masel,et al.  Genetic drift , 2011, Current Biology.

[17]  T. Young,et al.  A Hands-On Exercise to Demonstrate Evolution by Natural Selection & Genetic Drift. , 2003 .

[18]  S. Jakobi “Little Monkeys on the Grass…” How People for and Against Evolution Fail to Understand the Theory of Evolution , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[19]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[20]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[21]  D. Wescott,et al.  Still More “Fancy” and “Myth” than “Fact” in Students’ Conceptions of Evolution , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[22]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[23]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: understanding the wrong answers--teaching toward conceptual change. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[24]  V. Anfara,et al.  Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public , 2002 .

[25]  E. Fischbein,et al.  The Evolution with Age of Probabilistic, Intuitively Based Misconceptions. , 1997 .

[26]  Din Yan Yip,et al.  Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning , 1998 .

[27]  F. Ramsey,et al.  The statistical sleuth : a course in methods of data analysis , 2002 .

[28]  Eugenie C. Scott,et al.  Problem Concepts in Evolution Part II: Cause and Chance , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[29]  Cr Sridhar Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets , 2011 .

[30]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p‐prims? , 2001 .

[31]  Division on Earth BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[32]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Recognizing Student Misconceptions through Ed's Tools and the Biology Concept Inventory , 2008, PLoS biology.

[33]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Changes in Students' Understanding of Evolution Resulting from Different Curricular and Instructional Strategies. , 1996 .

[34]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Models of Phylogeny and the Evolution of Diversity , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[35]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[36]  John Settlage,et al.  Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process , 2007 .

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[38]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[39]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[40]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  “Are Humans Evolving?” A Classroom Discussion to Change Student Misconceptions Regarding Natural Selection , 2011, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[41]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[42]  N. Staub Teaching Evolutionary Mechanisms: Genetic Drift and M&M's® , 2002 .

[43]  S. Rissing,et al.  Exploring Genetic Drift & Natural Selection through a Simulation Activity , 1998 .