Factors associated with first-line bevacizumab use in advanced non-squamous and non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Bevacizumab was approved for treatment of advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the US in late 2006. Information on its uptake and patient and tumor factors associated with its use is lacking. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC aged 21 years or greater diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 at four Cancer Research Network sites. Patients were categorized as receiving first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) or carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab (CPB) within 120 days of diagnosis. Information on patient and tumor characteristics was obtained from queries of sites’ electronic tumor registries and administrative databases. Factors independently associated with CPB use were evaluated using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 1109 patients with advanced NSCLC were included with 198 (17.9%) and 911 (82.1%) patients receiving CPB and CP, respectively. Bevacizumab use increased modestly during the study period, peaking in 2008 at 18.5%. In bivariate analyses, patients who received CPB were younger with less comorbidity and well to moderately differentiated tumors while patients who received CP were more likely to have had hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and a prior hospitalization. Factors independently associated with CPB use included younger age, well/ moderately differentiated tumor grade, no prior hospitalization, and more recent study year. Conclusions: Use of bevacizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC increased rapidly then moderated. Younger patients and those with lower risks for adverse effects were more likely to receive bevacizumab.

[1]  G. Mann About the Cancer Research Network , 2014, Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology.

[2]  S. Quaratino,et al.  Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC , 2014 .

[3]  Nikki M. Carroll,et al.  Validation of Electronic Data on Chemotherapy and Hormone Therapy Use in HMOs , 2013, Medical care.

[4]  A. Rossi,et al.  Systemic inflammatory status at baseline predicts bevacizumab benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients , 2013, Cancer biology & therapy.

[5]  Nikki M. Carroll,et al.  Patterns and predictors of first-line chemotherapy use among adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the cancer research network. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[6]  Dhruv B. Sharma,et al.  Carboplatin and paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  Roy Pardee,et al.  Validity of Eight Integrated Healthcare Delivery Organizations' Administrative Clinical Data to Capture Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Exposure , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[8]  A. Neugut,et al.  Uptake of oxaliplatin and bevacizumab for treatment of node-positive and metastatic colon cancer. , 2012, Journal of oncology practice.

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  S. J. Henley,et al.  State-specific trends in lung cancer incidence and smoking--United States, 1999-2008. , 2011, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[11]  K. Kahn,et al.  Early dissemination of bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[12]  A. Abbruzzese,et al.  Phase II trial of bevacizumab and dose/dense chemotherapy with cisplatin and metronomic daily oral etoposide in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer patients , 2011, Cancer biology & therapy.

[13]  T. Smith,et al.  Using claims‐based measures to predict performance status score in patients with lung cancer , 2011, Cancer.

[14]  S. F. Carbone,et al.  Dose/dense metronomic chemotherapy with fractioned cisplatin and oral daily etoposide enhances the anti-angiogenic effects of bevacizumab in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer patients , 2010, Cancer biology & therapy.

[15]  R. Ramlau,et al.  Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Shenhong Wu,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. , 2008, JAMA.

[17]  D. Nochy,et al.  VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  R. Gray,et al.  Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. , 2007, The oncologist.

[20]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Building a virtual cancer research organization. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[22]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[23]  R F Galbraith,et al.  A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.