Reading Rate and Comprehension as a Function of Computerized versus Traditional Presentation Mode: A Preliminary Study

Using a counterbalanced, randomized treatment design, 12 elementary school-aged children read under two conditions: (a) independent, silent reading; and (b) computer-assisted reading, via Kurzweil 3000. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed no significant difference in the composite mean for comprehension and reading rate scores based on presentation strategy. Computerized text presentation (via auditory and visual means) proved no more effective than traditional reading instruction for teacher-nominated weak readers in improving reading rate and comprehension. However, a trend was noted for slower readers to show increased reading rate as a function of computer-assisted reading, with the opposite result for faster readers. Overall, results indicate that for students reading material at their instructional level, computer-assisted reading did not improve comprehension. Future research should continue to focus on the role of technology as an aid to reading instruction.

[1]  Pieter H. Reitsma,et al.  Reading Practice for Beginners: Effects of Guided Reading, Reading-while-Listening, and Independent Reading with Computer-Based Speech Feedback. , 1988 .

[2]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real-world issues , 1989 .

[3]  Z. Breznitz.  Reading Performance of First Graders: The Effects of Pictorial Distractors. , 1988 .

[4]  Timothy M. Lionetti,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Two Rates of Listening While Reading on Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension , 2004 .

[5]  Che Kan Leong,et al.  Enhancing reading comprehension with text-to-speech (DECtalk) computer system , 1992 .

[6]  D Pany,et al.  Effects of Corrective Feedback on Word Accuracy and Reading Comprehension of Readers with Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Optimal Rate of Reading Prose. , 1982 .

[8]  Åke Olofsson,et al.  Synthetic speech and computer aided reading for reading disabled children , 1992 .

[9]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Reading Rate and Prose Retrieval. , 1999 .

[10]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Computer-Assisted Reading , 1992 .

[11]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  The Compensatory Effectiveness of Optical Character Recognition/Speech Synthesis on Reading Comprehension of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997 .

[12]  J. Elkind,et al.  Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexia , 1993, Annals of dyslexia.

[13]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[14]  L. Lewandowski,et al.  Bimodal Reading: Benefits of a Talking Computer for Average and Less Skilled Readers , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  Gary Stoner,et al.  The Effects of Computerized Reading Instruction on the Academic Performance of Students Identified with ADHD , 2005 .

[16]  Yeunjoo Lee,et al.  Computer-Based Reading Instruction for Young Children with Disabilities , 2004 .

[17]  M. Mcmahon.  Development of Reading-While-Listening Skills in the Primary Grades. , 1983 .

[18]  The Effects of Two Prepractice Procedures on Oral Reading , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  Richard L. Allington,et al.  Content Coverage and Contextual Reading in Reading Groups , 1984 .

[20]  A. Biemiller,et al.  Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. , 1977 .

[21]  Zvia Breznitz,et al.  Increasing first graders' reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rates. , 1987 .

[22]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[23]  R. Olson,et al.  Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  L. Katz,et al.  Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders , 2002 .

[25]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech , 1986 .