Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners?

[1]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[3]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[5]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[6]  E. Oláh,et al.  Emerging roles of BRCA1 alternative splicing , 2003, Molecular pathology : MP.

[7]  J. Bonfield,et al.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Meena Kishore Sakharkar,et al.  Distributions of exons and introns in the human genome , 2004, Silico Biol..

[9]  L. Stein.  21.10 n&v 915 MH , 2004 .

[10]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[11]  A. Ashworth.  Refocusing on BRCA1 , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  P. Bork,et al.  Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2005, Science.

[13]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: organization, cooperativity and mapping in a bottom-up Systems Biology approach , 2005, Physical biology.

[14]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Flexible nets , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[15]  Takeshi Itoh,et al.  Alternative splicing in human transcriptome: functional and structural influence on proteins. , 2006, Gene.

[16]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks? , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[17]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Relating Three-Dimensional Structures to Protein Networks Provides Evolutionary Insights , 2006, Science.

[18]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder Is a Common Feature of Hub Proteins from Four Eukaryotic Interactomes , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Toshiaki Hara,et al.  Structure of the Tfb1/p53 complex: Insights into the interaction between the p62/Tfb1 subunit of TFIIH and the activation domain of p53. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[21]  A. Elofsson,et al.  What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? , 2006, Genome Biology.

[22]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 Table S1 Movies S1 to S3 a " Silent " Polymorphism in the Mdr1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity Corrected 30 November 2007; See Last Page , 2022 .

[24]  D. Schmucker,et al.  Structural basis of Dscam isoform specificity , 2006, Nature.

[25]  A. Sali,et al.  The molecular sociology of the cell , 2007, Nature.

[26]  R Nussinov,et al.  Towards drugs targeting multiple proteins in a systems biology approach. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  Characterization of Protein Hubs by Inferring Interacting Motifs from Protein Interactions , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  D. Schmucker,et al.  Molecular diversity of Dscam: recognition of molecular identity in neuronal wiring , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Similar binding sites and different partners: implications to shared proteins in cellular pathways. , 2007, Structure.

[30]  Alternative translation initiation further increases the molecular and functional diversity of ion channels , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Wei Gu,et al.  SnapShot: p53 Posttranslational Modifications , 2008, Cell.

[32]  S. Tommasi,et al.  Molecular and in silico analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. , 2008, Mutation research.

[33]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Cataloging and organizing p73 interactions in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  A. Hopkins.  Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[35]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Variations in clique and community patterns in protein structures during allosteric communication: investigation of dynamically equilibrated structures of methionyl tRNA synthetase complexes. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[36]  István A. Kovács,et al.  Drug-therapy networks and the prediction of novel drug targets , 2008, Journal of biology.

[37]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[38]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Conformational switching upon phosphorylation: a predictive framework based on energy landscape principles. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[39]  K. J. Hertel,et al.  Combinatorial Control of Exon Recognition* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? , 2008, Chemical reviews.

[41]  P. Csermely.  Creative elements: network-based predictions of active centres in proteins and cellular and social networks. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[42]  E. Raineri,et al.  Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks , 2008, Nature.

[43]  Dierk Thomas,et al.  Alternative Translation Initiation in Rat Brain Yields K2P2.1 Potassium Channels Permeable to Sodium , 2008, Neuron.

[44]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Synonymous mutations and ribosome stalling can lead to altered folding pathways and distinct minima. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  D. Boehr,et al.  How Do Proteins Interact? , 2008, Science.

[46]  P. Hainaut,et al.  p53 isoforms - A conspiracy to kidnap p53 tumor suppressor activity? , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[47]  Donghee Kim,et al.  Control of the single channel conductance of K2P10.1 (TREK‐2) by the amino‐terminus: role of alternative translation initiation , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  K. Makova,et al.  Coding region structural heterogeneity and turnover of transcription start sites contribute to divergence in expression between duplicate genes , 2009, Genome Biology.

[49]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  A Protein Domain-Based Interactome Network for C. elegans Early Embryogenesis , 2008, Cell.

[50]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Towards inferring time dimensionality in protein–protein interaction networks by integrating structures: the p53 example† †This article is part of a Molecular BioSystems themed issue on Computational and Systems Biology. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[51]  R. Sharan,et al.  Toward accurate reconstruction of functional protein networks , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[52]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  p38α and p38γ Mediate Oncogenic ras-induced Senescence through Differential Mechanisms* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  V. Graupner,et al.  Functional characterization of p53β and p53γ, two isoforms of the tumor suppressor p53 , 2009 .

[54]  Emmanuel D. Levy,et al.  How Perfect Can Protein Interactomes Be? , 2009, Science Signaling.

[55]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[56]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Energetic determinants of protein binding specificity: Insights into protein interaction networks , 2009, Proteomics.

[57]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Allosteric Communication Occurs via Networks of Tertiary and Quaternary Motions in Proteins , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..