Cost of Virtual Machine Live Migration in Clouds: A Performance Evaluation

Virtualization has become commonplace in modern data centers, often referred as "computing clouds". The capability of virtual machine live migration brings benefits such as improved performance, manageability and fault tolerance, while allowing workload movement with a short service downtime. However, service levels of applications are likely to be negatively affected during a live migration. For this reason, a better understanding of its effects on system performance is desirable. In this paper, we evaluate the effects of live migration of virtual machines on the performance of applications running inside Xen VMs. Results show that, in most cases, migration overhead is acceptable but cannot be disregarded, especially in systems where availability and responsiveness are governed by strict Service Level Agreements. Despite that, there is a high potential for live migration applicability in data centers serving modern Internet applications. Our results are based on a workload covering the domain of multi-tier Web 2.0 applications.

[1]  Jeffrey Casazza,et al.  Redefining Server Performance Characterization for Virtualization Benchmarking , 2006 .

[2]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Article in Press Future Generation Computer Systems ( ) – Future Generation Computer Systems Cloud Computing and Emerging It Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th Utility , 2022 .

[3]  Natalie D. Enright Jerger,et al.  An Evaluation of Server Consolidation Workloads for Multi-Core Designs , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Workload Characterization.

[4]  R. Iyer.  Datacenter-on-Chip Architectures : Tera-scale Opportunities and Challenges in Intel ' s Manufacturing Environment , 2007 .

[5]  Christian Engelmann,et al.  Proactive fault tolerance for HPC with Xen virtualization , 2007, ICS '07.

[6]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Table of Contents , 2016 .

[7]  Renato J. O. Figueiredo,et al.  Experimental Study of Virtual Machine Migration in Support of Reservation of Cluster Resources , 2007, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Virtualization Technology in Distributed Computing (VTDC '07).

[8]  Ravi Iyer,et al.  DatacenteronChip Architectures Terascale Opportunities and Challenges , 2007 .

[9]  A. Fox,et al.  Cloudstone : Multi-Platform , Multi-Language Benchmark and Measurement Tools for Web 2 . 0 , 2008 .

[10]  Muli Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Xen and KVM , 2008 .

[11]  Leon Gommans,et al.  Seamless live migration of virtual machines over the MAN/WAN , 2006, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[12]  Walfredo Cirne,et al.  Evaluating architectures for independently auditing service level agreements , 2006, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[13]  Gil Neiger,et al.  Intel virtualization technology , 2005, Computer.

[14]  Andrew Warfield,et al.  Live migration of virtual machines , 2005, NSDI.

[15]  Ludmila Cherkasova,et al.  Measuring CPU Overhead for I/O Processing in the Xen Virtual Machine Monitor , 2005, USENIX ATC, General Track.

[16]  Dejan S. Milojicic,et al.  Process migration , 1999, ACM Comput. Surv..

[17]  Xiaomin Zhang,et al.  Characterization & analysis of a server consolidation benchmark , 2008, VEE '08.