Applications of Integrated Transport and Gravity-Based Land Use Models for Policy Analysis

Forecasting urban futures is of great importance to ensure the adequate provision of public and private services and to implement policies that guide demand while mitigating negative impacts. This study produces year 2030 predictions of land use and travel conditions across the Austin–Round Rock statistical metropolitan area of Texas by integrating a gravity-based land use model (modeled on Putman's Integrated Transportation–Land Use Package specification) with a standard travel demand model. The land use model cycles through job, household, and land consumption estimates across traffic analysis zones before feeding forward into a contemporaneous model of travel patterns. To understand the implications of different policies better, three scenarios were generated: a business-as-usual scenario, a congestion pricing plus carbon tax scenario, and an urban growth boundary (UGB) scenario. Results reveal how these transportation and land use policies may shape our land and travel futures, and they illuminate challenges and pitfalls of the gravity-based approach to land use (including the accompanying land consumption model). Of particular interest is that the imposition of road pricing (roughly 5¢/mi) had almost no discernable effect on land use predictions, yet resulted in the same predicted reduction in regional vehicle miles traveled as the UGB policy (roughly 15%).

[1]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Visioning versus Modeling: Analyzing the Land-Use-Transportation Futures of Urban Regions , 2008 .

[2]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Should Automobile Fuel Economy Standards be Tightened? , 2007 .

[3]  Brian J Gregor,et al.  Land Use Scenario DevelopeR , 2007 .

[4]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Tracking land use, transport, and industrial production using random-utility-based multiregional input-output models : applications for Texas trade , 2005 .

[5]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions , 2003 .

[6]  E. Lambin,et al.  Predicting land-use change , 2001 .

[7]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1999 .

[8]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land-Use Policies , 1998 .

[9]  F. Martínez MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City , 1996 .

[10]  S H Putman,et al.  Integrated Urban Models 2: New Research and Applications of Optimization and Dynamics , 1991 .

[11]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  Integrated Urban Models , 1985 .

[12]  Alan Borning,et al.  Urbansim: Using Simulation to Inform Public Deliberation and Decision-Making , 2008, Digital Government.

[13]  Ming Zhong,et al.  Developing and Applying a Parcel-Level Simulation of Developer Actions in Baltimore , 2008 .

[14]  K. Kockelman,et al.  APPLICATIONS OF INTEGRATED MODELS OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF ITLUP AND URBANSIM LAND USE MODELS , 2007 .

[15]  K. Small,et al.  The economics of urban transportation , 2007 .

[16]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: Dallas-Fort Worth Application , 2006 .

[17]  Alan Borning,et al.  Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim , 2003 .

[18]  W A Martin,et al.  Travel estimation techniques for urban planning , 1998 .

[19]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .