Micro-computed tomography analysis of early stage bone healing using micro-porous titanium mesh for guided bone regeneration: preliminary experiment in a canine model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of bone formation beneath a defect area after treatment with titanium mesh membranes with different thicknesses and pore sizes alone or in combination with bone graft to induce bone formation during the early stage of healing time. The mandibular premolars were extracted bilaterally from three adult beagle dogs, and 8-mm-diameter bone defects were created on the buccal site of the premolar regions. Hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute was applied in the defect site unilaterally, and other site was left empty. Then, a novel micro-porous mesh (50 μm in pore diameter) or commercially available macro-porous titanium mesh (1700 μm in pore diameter) was placed on the defect and secured with screws. After 4 weeks, the mandibles were harvested, imaged using micro-computed tomography, and prepared for histological and morphometric evaluation. Higher new bone volumes (mm3), percentage of new bone volumes in the total defect volumes (bone ratio: %), and new bone area (mm2) through morphometric evaluation were found on the novel membranes with 50-μm-diameter pores compared to the commercial titanium mesh. Moreover, experiment sites without bone graft were observed with higher new bone volume and bone ratio compared with sites with bone graft. However, bone mineral density of novel mesh was observed to be lower compared with other experimental sites. Under the experimental condition, the result of this study suggests that titanium meshes with 50-μm-diameter pores were effective for guided bone regeneration in the early stage of healing.

[1]  A. Garg Barrier membranes--materials review, Part I of II. , 2011, Dental implantology update.

[2]  Y. Vovk,et al.  Results of the guided bone regeneration in patients with jaw defects and atrophies by means of Mondeal® occlusive titanium membranes , 2005 .

[3]  V. Petrovic,et al.  Craniofacial bone tissue engineering. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[4]  Solon T. Kao,et al.  A review of bone substitutes. , 2007, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[5]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Incomplete bone healing of experimental cavities in dog mandibles. , 1971, The British journal of oral surgery.

[6]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  K. Koyano,et al.  Fibroblast attachment onto novel titanium mesh membranes for guided bone regeneration , 2014, Odontology.

[8]  W. R. Moore,et al.  Synthetic bone graft substitutes , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[9]  Sottosanti Js Calcium sulfate: a valuable addition to the implant/bone regeneration complex. , 1997 .

[10]  A. Bartolucci,et al.  Barrier membranes used for ridge augmentation: is there an optimal pore size? , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  S. Kalita,et al.  Nanocrystalline calcium phosphate ceramics in biomedical engineering , 2007 .

[12]  J. Carr,et al.  Evaluation of a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible. , 1995, The Journal of oral implantology.

[13]  Todd V Scantlebury,et al.  1982-1992: A Decade of Technology Development for Guided Tissue Regeneration. , 1993, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  D F Taylor,et al.  Porous methyl methacrylate as an implant material. , 1972, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  R. Jung,et al.  A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  R. Hardwick Membrane design criteria for guided bone regeneration of the alveolar ridge , 1994 .

[17]  T. Gowda,et al.  Use of titanium mesh for staged 3D localized alveolar ridge augmentation , 2014 .

[18]  N. Hardt,et al.  Localized ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh: a report on 27 implants followed from 1 to 3 years after functional loading. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  D. Lundgren,et al.  Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rat. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  A comparative assessment of synthetic ceramic bone substitutes with different composition and microstructure in rabbit femoral condyle model. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  F. R. Grassi,et al.  Immediate transmucosal implant placement in fresh maxillary and mandibular molar extraction sockets: description of technique and preliminary results. , 2008, Minerva stomatologica.

[22]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  S. Berrone,et al.  Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  M. Longaker,et al.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Engineering , 2014, Journal of dental research.

[25]  C. Thorén,et al.  Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. , 1993, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[26]  J. Wagner Clinical and histological case study using resorbable hydroxylapatite for the repair of osseous defects prior to endosseous implant surgery. , 1989, The Journal of oral implantology.

[27]  I. Yannas,et al.  Tissue regeneration by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[28]  R. Smith,et al.  Histological evaluation of biodegradable and non-degradable membranes placed transcutaneously in rats. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[29]  H. Moriya,et al.  Enhanced fixation of implants by bone ingrowth to titanium fiber mesh: effect of incorporation of hydroxyapatite powder. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[30]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  W Becker,et al.  A prospective multi-center study evaluating periodontal regeneration for Class II furcation invasions and intrabony defects after treatment with a bioabsorbable barrier membrane: 1-year results. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[32]  R Holusa,et al.  Some chemical and biological characteristics of a new collagen-polymer compound material. , 1969, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[33]  K. Koyano,et al.  Microcomputed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses of novel titanium mesh membranes for guided bone regeneration: a study in rat calvarial defects. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  R. Pilliar,et al.  Surgical implants. The role of surface porosity in fixation to bone and acrylic. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  L. Rodella,et al.  Biomaterials in Maxillofacial Surgery: Membranes and Grafts , 2011, International journal of biomedical science : IJBS.

[36]  K. Ohsaki,et al.  Histological reaction of auditory bulla bone to synthetic auditory ossicle (Apaceram) in rats. , 2000, The journal of medical investigation : JMI.

[37]  M. Spector,et al.  Bone growth into porous high-density polyethylene. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  C. Johansson,et al.  A comparative study of barrier membranes as graft protectors in the treatment of localized bone defects. An experimental study in a canine model. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[39]  P Schärer,et al.  Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[40]  A. Linde,et al.  Effects of different osteopromotive membrane porosities on experimental bone neogenesis in rats. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[41]  K. Koyano,et al.  Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. , 2013, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[42]  Miqin Zhang,et al.  Biocompatibility of Materials , 2004 .

[43]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.