The effect of load on agent-based algorithms for distributed task allocation

Multi-agent algorithms inspired by the division of labour in social insects and by markets, are applied to a constrained problem of distributed task allocation. The efficiency (average number of tasks performed), the flexibility (ability to react to changes in the environment), and the sensitivity to load (ability to cope with differing demands) are investigated in both static and dynamic environments. A hybrid algorithm combining both approaches, is shown to exhibit improved efficiency and robustness. We employ nature inspired particle swarm optimisation to obtain optimised parameters for all algorithms in a range of representative environments. Although results are obtained for large population sizes to avoid finite size effects, the influence of population size on the performance is also analysed. From a theoretical point of view, we analyse the causes of efficiency loss, derive theoretical upper bounds for the efficiency, and compare these with the experimental results.

[1]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Distributed adaptive task allocation in heterogeneous computing environments to maximize throughput , 2004, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings..

[2]  Martijn C. Schut,et al.  On model design for simulation of collective intelligence , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Tales Heimfarth,et al.  Emergent Topology Control Based on Division of Labour in Ants , 2006, 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Volume 1 (AINA'06).

[5]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Distributed Coordination of Resources via Wasp-Like Agents , 2002, WRAC.

[6]  Kian Hsiang Low,et al.  Task Allocation via Self-Organizing Swarm Coalitions in Distributed Mobile Sensor Network , 2004, AAAI.

[7]  Yizhen Zhang,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for unsupervised robotic learning , 2005, Proceedings 2005 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2005. SIS 2005..

[8]  O. Kittithreerapronchai,et al.  Do ants paint trucks better than chickens? Markets versus response thresholds for distributed dynamic scheduling , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[9]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.

[10]  Prithviraj Dasgupta,et al.  Auction-based multi-robot task allocation in COMSTAR , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[11]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Issues in Multiagent Resource Allocation , 2006, Informatica.

[12]  Tamio Arai,et al.  Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 3 , 1998 .

[13]  Muddassar Farooq,et al.  Swarm intelligence based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: Survey and future directions , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[14]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labor in insect societies , 1998 .

[15]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Analysis of Dynamic Task Allocation in Multi-Robot Systems , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  W. Xiang,et al.  Ant colony intelligence in multi-agent dynamic manufacturing scheduling , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Harry Goldingay,et al.  The Influence of Memory in a Threshold Model for Distributed Task Assignment , 2008, 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[18]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling and Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems , 1999 .

[20]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[21]  Martin Weigt,et al.  Finitely coordinated models for low-temperature phases of amorphous systems , 2007 .

[22]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  An Insect-Based Algorithm for the Dynamic Task Allocation Problem , 2005, Künstliche Intell..

[23]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[24]  Maurice Clerc,et al.  The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[25]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Comparative Study of Market-Based and Threshold-Based Task Allocation , 2006, DARS.

[26]  K. R. Anupama,et al.  On the use of particle swarm optimization for adaptive resource allocation in orthogonal frequency division multiple access systems with proportional rate constraints , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Wasp-like Agents for Distributed Factory Coordination , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[28]  M. Dorigo,et al.  An Ant-Based Algorithm for the Dynamic Task Allocation Problem , 2004 .

[29]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[30]  Harry Goldingay,et al.  Evolution of competing strategies in a threshold model for task allocation , 2010 .

[31]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Three-dimensional architectures grown by simple 'stigmergic' agents. , 2000, Bio Systems.

[32]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[33]  Naim Dahnoun,et al.  Studies in Computational Intelligence , 2013 .

[34]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[35]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Peter Tiño,et al.  Evaluation of Adaptive Nature Inspired Task Allocation Against Alternate Decentralised Multiagent Strategies , 2004, PPSN.