Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?

The recently developed field of ligand homology modeling (LHM) that extends the ideas of protein homology modeling to the prediction of ligand binding sites and for use in virtual ligand screening has emerged as a powerful new approach. Unlike traditional docking methodologies, LHM can be applied to low-to-moderate resolution predicted as well as experimental structures with little if any diminution in performance; thereby enabling ≈ 75% of an average proteome to have potentially significant virtual screening predictions. In large scale benchmarking, LHM is able to predict off-target ligand binding. Thus, despite the widespread belief to the contrary, low-to-moderate resolution predicted structures have considerable utility for biochemical function prediction.

[1]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Comparison of structure‐based and threading‐based approaches to protein functional annotation , 2010, Proteins.

[2]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  SMAP-WS: a parallel web service for structural proteome-wide ligand-binding site comparison , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  M. Ondrechen,et al.  THEMATICS: A simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Russell,et al.  Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  R. Kroemer Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.

[6]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  M Hendlich,et al.  LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[8]  Satoshi Niijima,et al.  GLIDA: GPCR—ligand database for chemical genomics drug discovery—database and tools update , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  J. Skolnick,et al.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  Template‐based protein structure modeling using TASSERVMT , 2012, Proteins.

[11]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  J. J. Díaz-Mejía,et al.  Network-based function prediction and interactomics: the case for metabolic enzymes. , 2011, Metabolic engineering.

[13]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Shankaracharya,et al.  Tools for predicting metal binding sites in protein: A Review , 2011 .

[15]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  A Multidimensional Strategy to Detect Polypharmacological Targets in the Absence of Structural and Sequence Homology , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  FINDSITELHM: A Threading-Based Approach to Ligand Homology Modeling , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Yongbo Hu,et al.  Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Recognizing protein-ligand binding sites by global structural alignment and local geometry refinement. , 2012, Structure.

[19]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Cross-reactivity virtual profiling of the human kinome by X-react(KIN): a chemical systems biology approach. , 2010, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[20]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  Yang Zhang,et al.  COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  I. Kuntz,et al.  DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. , 2009, RNA.

[23]  David S Wishart,et al.  DrugBank and its relevance to pharmacogenomics. , 2008, Pharmacogenomics.

[24]  Yang Zhang,et al.  BSP‐SLIM: A blind low‐resolution ligand‐protein docking approach using predicted protein structures , 2012, Proteins.

[25]  Angela D. Wilkins,et al.  Evolutionary trace for prediction and redesign of protein functional sites. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  CASP9 results compared to those of previous casp experiments , 2011, Proteins.

[27]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  FINDSITE(X): a structure-based, small molecule virtual screening approach with application to all identified human GPCRs. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[28]  Motonori Ota,et al.  PSCDB: a database for protein structural change upon ligand binding , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Lincoln Stein,et al.  Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Richard A. Lewis,et al.  Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[32]  Michael J E Sternberg,et al.  The proteome: structure, function and evolution , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller , 2006, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[34]  Angela D. Wilkins,et al.  Evolution: a guide to perturb protein function and networks. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[35]  Yu Li,et al.  Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction , 2011, Bioinform..

[36]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Extending Biochemical Databases by Metabolomic Surveys* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I‐TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK‐based ab initio folding and FG‐MD‐based structure refinement , 2011, Proteins.

[38]  M. Schroeder,et al.  LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.

[39]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Comprehensive Structural and Functional Characterization of the Human Kinome by Protein Structure Modeling and Ligand Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  Andrei L Osterman,et al.  Ligand binding-induced conformational changes in riboflavin kinase: structural basis for the ordered mechanism. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[41]  Markus Fischer,et al.  MarkUs: a server to navigate sequence–structure–function space , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[43]  Wayne A Hendrickson,et al.  What is 'current opinion' in structural biology? , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  S. Erdin,et al.  Evolutionary trace annotation of protein function in the structural proteome. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.

[47]  A. Elcock Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  J. Irwin,et al.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Michael J. E. Sternberg,et al.  3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  Lei Xie,et al.  Structure-based systems biology for analyzing off-target binding. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[52]  J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[53]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[55]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[56]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[58]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Q‐DockLHM: Low‐resolution refinement for ligand comparative modeling , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[59]  Neil Swainston,et al.  Further developments towards a genome-scale metabolic model of yeast , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[60]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Automated prediction of protein function and detection of functional sites from structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  FINDSITEcomb: A Threading/Structure-Based, Proteomic-Scale Virtual Ligand Screening Approach , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[62]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[63]  J. Thornton,et al.  A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures , 2005, Proteins.

[64]  Anna Vulpetti,et al.  Assessment of Docking Poses: Interactions-Based Accuracy Classification (IBAC) versus Crystal Structure Deviations. , 2004 .

[65]  J. Skolnick,et al.  What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins? , 2007, Proteins.

[66]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement. , 2011, Journal of structural biology.

[67]  J. Skolnick,et al.  FINDSITE‐metal: Integrating evolutionary information and machine learning for structure‐based metal‐binding site prediction at the proteome level , 2011, Proteins.

[68]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Q‐Dock: Low‐resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket‐specific threading restraints , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..