Green‐Ampt Curve‐Number mixed procedure as an empirical tool for rainfall–runoff modelling in small and ungauged basins

The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is a popular rainfall–runoff model that is widely used to estimate direct runoff from small and ungauged basins. The SCS-CN is a simple and valuable approach to quantify the total streamflow volume generated by storm rainfall, but its use is not appropriate for estimating the sub-daily incremental rainfall excess. To overcome this drawback, we propose to include the Green-Ampt (GA) infiltration model into a mixed procedure, which is referred to as Curve Number for Green-Ampt (CN4GA), aiming to distribute in time the information provided by the SCS-CN method. For a given storm, the computed SCS-CN total net rainfall amount is employed to calibrate the soil hydraulic conductivity parameter of the GA model. The proposed procedure is evaluated by analysing 100 rainfall–runoff events that were observed in four small catchments of varying size. CN4GA appears to provide encouraging results for predicting the net rainfall peak and duration values and has shown, at least for the test cases considered in this study, better agreement with the observed hydrographs than the classic SCS-CN method. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Nanée Chahinian,et al.  Accounting for temporal variation in soil hydrological properties when simulating surface runoff on tilled plots , 2006 .

[2]  M. Todd Walter,et al.  DISCUSSION.: "Curve Number Hydrology in Water Quality Modeling: Uses, Abuses, and Future Directions," by David C. Garen and Daniel S. Moore. , 2005 .

[3]  S. Grimaldi,et al.  A parsimonious geomorphological unit hydrograph for rainfall–runoff modelling in small ungauged basins , 2012 .

[4]  R. Eli,et al.  Curve Numbers and Urban Runoff Modeling—Application Limitations , 2010 .

[5]  Allen T. Hjelmfelt,et al.  Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio , 2003 .

[6]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Time of concentration: a paradox in modern hydrology , 2012 .

[7]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Soil hydrology : geoEcology textbook , 1994 .

[8]  Van Mullem Runoff and Peak Discharges Using Green-Ampt Infiltration Model , 1991 .

[9]  Curtis L. Larson,et al.  Modeling infiltration during a steady rain , 1973 .

[10]  Francesco Serinaldi,et al.  Synthetic Design Hydrographs Based on Distribution Functions with Finite Support , 2011 .

[11]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Development and Integration of Sub-hourly Rainfall–Runoff Modeling Capability Within a Watershed Model , 2010 .

[12]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Agricultural Management Effects on Soil Water Processes Part II: Green and Ampt Parameters for Crusting Soils , 1983 .

[13]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[14]  Herman Bouwer,et al.  Rapid field measurement of air entry value and hydraulic conductivity of soil as significant parameters in flow system analysis , 1966 .

[15]  Maria Mimikou,et al.  Technical Note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece , 2007 .

[16]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Using a topographic index to distribute variable source area runoff predicted with the SCS curve‐number equation , 2004 .

[17]  H. Bouwer Infiltration of Water into Nonuniform Soil , 1969 .

[18]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[19]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Estimation of Soil Water Properties , 1982 .

[20]  D. G. Durbude,et al.  Long‐term hydrologic simulation using SCS‐CN‐based improved soil moisture accounting procedure , 2011 .

[21]  David C. Garen,et al.  CURVE NUMBER HYDROLOGY IN WATER QUALITY MODELING: USES, ABUSES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 1 , 2005 .

[22]  C. L. Mcconnell A general correction for spontaneous potential well logs in fresh water , 1988 .

[23]  L. M. Risse,et al.  Variability in Green-Ampt effective hydraulic conductivity under fallow conditions , 1995 .

[24]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[25]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Green‐ampt Infiltration Parameters from Soils Data , 1983 .

[26]  Robert E. Rallison,et al.  Origin and Evolution of the SCS Runoff Equation , 1980 .

[27]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[28]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  COMPARISON OF GREEN-AMPT AND CURVE NUMBER METHODS ON GOODWIN CREEK WATERSHED USING SWAT , 1999 .

[29]  T. Eldho,et al.  An Improved IaS Relation Incorporating Antecedent Moisture in SCS-CN Methodology , 2006 .

[30]  G. Marini,et al.  Experimental assessment of level pool routing in preliminary design of floodplain storage. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[32]  F. D. Whisler,et al.  COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING VERTICAL DRAINAGE AND INFILTRATION FOR SOILS , 1970 .

[33]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Discussion of "Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation" , 2010 .

[34]  K. Geetha,et al.  Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation , 2007 .

[35]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Long‐term hydrological simulation based on the Soil Conservation Service curve number , 2004 .

[36]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.