Context‐dependent mutations predominate in an engineered high‐affinity single chain antibody fragment

A mutational analysis of the femtomolar‐affinity anti‐fluorescein antibody 4M5.3, compared to its wild‐type progenitor, 4‐4‐20, indicates both context‐dependent and ‐independent mutations are responsible for the 1800‐fold affinity improvement. 4M5.3 was engineered from 4‐4‐20 by directed evolution and contains 14 mutations. The seven mutations identified as present in each of 10 final round affinity maturation clones were studied here. Affinities of the 4‐4‐20 single mutant addition and 4M5.3 single site reversion mutants were compared. These experiments identified four mutations, of these seven, that were context‐dependent in their contribution to higher affinity. A simplified mutant containing only these seven mutations was created to analyze complete double mutant cycles of selected sets of mutations. Specific mutational sets studied included the ligand contact mutations, the heavy chain CDR3 mutations, the heavy chain CDR3 mutations plus the neighboring residue at site H108, and the early and late acquired mutations on the directed evolution pathway. The heavy chain CDR3 mutational set and the ligand‐contacting mutations were shown to provide −1.4 and −2.0 kcal/mol, respectively, of the total −3.5 kcal/mol change in free energy of binding of the seven‐site consensus mutant. The mutations acquired late in the directed evolution rounds provided much of the change in free energy without the earlier acquired mutations (−3.1 kcal/mol of the total −3.5 kcal/mol). Prior structural data and electrostatic calculations presented several hypotheses for the higher affinity contributions, some of which are supported by these mutational data.

[1]  R C Stevens,et al.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. , 1997, Science.

[2]  J. Herron,et al.  Molecular dynamics of the anti-fluorescein 4-4-20 antigen-binding fragment. 1. Computer simulations. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[3]  P. Schultz,et al.  Mutational analysis of the affinity maturation of antibody 48G7. , 1999, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[4]  E. Voss,et al.  Mutational analysis of active site contact residues in anti-fluorescein monoclonal antibody 4-4-20. , 1993, Molecular Immunology.

[5]  J. Foote,et al.  Kinetic and affinity limits on antibodies produced during immune responses. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Directed evolution of antibody fragments with monovalent femtomolar antigen-binding affinity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  B Tidor,et al.  Substantial energetic improvement with minimal structural perturbation in a high affinity mutant antibody. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  D. Kranz,et al.  Mechanisms of ligand binding by monoclonal anti-fluorescyl antibodies. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  R C Stevens,et al.  A comparative analysis of the immunological evolution of antibody 28B4. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[10]  A. Chilkoti,et al.  Structural studies of binding site tryptophan mutants in the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  E. Voss,et al.  Identification of the binding site of two monoclonal antibodies to human protamine , 1993 .

[12]  D. Kranz,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of ligand binding by monoclonal anti-fluorescyl antibodies. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[13]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Molecular recognition in antibody-antigen complexes. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[14]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  X-ray snapshots of the maturation of an antibody response to a protein antigen , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  The free energies for mutating S27 and W79 to alanine in streptavidin and its biotin complex: The relative size of polar and nonpolar free energies on biotin binding , 1999, Proteins.

[16]  A. Edmundson,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of idiotypically related Fabs with intermediate and high affinity for fluorescein. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J. Xu,et al.  Diversity in the CDR3 region of V(H) is sufficient for most antibody specificities. , 2000, Immunity.

[18]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: Charge complementarity in the barnase‐barstar protein complex , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  J. Herron,et al.  Molecular dynamics of the anti-fluorescein 4-4-20 antigen-binding fragment. 2. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[20]  Allen H. Terry,et al.  High resolution structures of the 4-4-20 Fab-fluorescein complex in two solvent systems: effects of solvent on structure and antigen-binding affinity. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[21]  L Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  K. D. Hardman,et al.  1.85 A structure of anti-fluorescein 4-4-20 Fab. , 1995, Protein engineering.