Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy

Changing U.S. attitudes toward new technologies are examined, as are explanations of such changes. We hypothesize that increased concern with the risks of new technologies by certain elite groups is partly a surrogate for underlying ideological criticisms of U.S. society. The question of risk is examined within the framework of the debate over nuclear energy. Studies of various leadership groups are used to demonstrate the ideological component of risk assessment. Studies of scientists' and journalists' attitudes, media coverage of nuclear energy, and public perception of scientists' views suggest both that journalists' ideologies influence their coverage of nuclear energy and that media coverage of the issue is partly responsible for public misperceptions of the views of scientists. We conclude with a discussion of the historical development of the environmental movement in the 1960s and 1970s and the relation of this movement to the public's declining support for nuclear energy.

[1]  Brett Williams.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[2]  R. Dunlap,et al.  No Nukes! A Comparison of Participants in Two National Antinuclear Demonstrations , 1986 .

[3]  A. Levine,et al.  Reflections on Science and the Media. , 1985 .

[4]  R. Dunlap,et al.  HARD‐PATH VERSUS SOFT‐PATH ADVOCATES: A STUDY OF ENERGY ACTIVISTS , 1984 .

[5]  S. Rothman.  Ideology Authoritarianism and Mental Health , 1984 .

[6]  E. William Colglazier,et al.  Nuclear Power in an Age of Uncertainty , 1984 .

[7]  S. Lichter,et al.  Scientists' attitudes towards nuclear energy , 1983, Nature.

[8]  Kristian R. Albert.  Before it's too late: a scientist's case for nuclear energy , 1983 .

[9]  H. Wetzler.  Risk /Benefit Analysis , 1983 .

[10]  Anthony E. Ladd,et al.  Ideological Themes in the Antinuclear Movement: Consensus and Diversity* , 1983 .

[11]  Seymour Martin Lipset,et al.  Radicalism or Reformism: The Sources of Working-class Politics , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[12]  George A. Silver,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[13]  S. Lichter,et al.  Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and The New Left , 1982 .

[14]  S. Lipset.  The Academic Mind at the Top: The Political Behavior and Values of Faculty Elites , 1982 .

[15]  A C Upton,et al.  The biological effects of low-level ionizing radiation. , 1982, Scientific American.

[16]  D. J. Webber.  Is Nuclear Power Just Another Environmental Issue? , 1982 .

[17]  R. Inglehart.  Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity , 1981, American Political Science Review.

[18]  G. Rodger.  Before it's too late... , 1981, The Canadian nurse.

[19]  R. Nisbet.  History of the Idea of Progress , 1981 .

[20]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  Richer is Safer , 1981 .

[21]  D. Nelkin,et al.  The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany by Dorothy Nelkin, Michael Pollak (review) , 1980 .

[22]  N. Wade.  France's All-out Nuclear Program Takes Shape. , 1980, Science.

[23]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death , 1979 .

[24]  Joan Bromberg,et al.  Science, Politics, and Controversy: Civilian Nuclear Power in the United States, 1946-1974 , 1979 .

[25]  Ralph Nader,et al.  Menace of Atomic Energy , 1979 .

[26]  L. Sagan.  Environment, Technology, and Health: Human Ecology in Historical Perspective , 1979 .

[27]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Rating the Risks , 1979 .

[28]  J. Clippinger,et al.  The Hidden Agenda , 1979 .

[29]  H. Brooks.  Technology: Hope or catastrophe? , 1979 .

[30]  Michael J. Robinson.  Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon” , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[31]  Patrick P. Mccurdy,et al.  The Closing Circle , 1971 .

[32]  R. Gale,et al.  The Environmental Movement , 1971 .

[33]  Fred G. Evenden,et al.  Wilderness and the American Mind , 1968 .

[34]  W. Orton,et al.  The Liberal Tradition. , 1946 .

[35]  Stanley Rothman,et al.  The Media Elite , 1986 .

[36]  Stanley Rothman,et al.  The Poverty of Affluence , 1983 .

[37]  Seymour Martin Lipset,et al.  The Confidence Gap , 1983 .

[38]  Evan Vlachos,et al.  The dynamics of technical controversy , 1981 .

[39]  Y. Aharoni,et al.  No-risk society , 1981 .

[40]  R. Dubos.  The wooing of Earth , 1980 .

[41]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF THE NUCLEAR DEBATE: THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION* , 1978 .

[42]  Daniel A. Bell,et al.  The Cultural Contradictions Of Capitalism , 1976 .

[43]  Rae Goodell,et al.  The visible scientists , 1975 .

[44]  S. Lipset,et al.  The divided academy , 1975 .

[45]  L E Kerr,et al.  The poverty of affluence. , 1975, American journal of public health.