Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study.

PURPOSE To evaluate the technical performance of the CSA accelerometer-based activity monitor. METHODS Twenty-three CSA monitors were subjected to intra- and inter-instrument variability tests by controlled trials using a motorized turntable. The CSA monitor measures change in acceleration, and precision was tested by producing sinusoidal variations in speed around two fixed baseline speeds (fast and medium). The angle of the monitor to the line of force along the radius of the turntable was varied using tilted blocks. Three sets of tests were carried out. 1. Intra-instrument variability: seven monitors were tested three times in each of the four quadrants. 2. All 23 monitors were used for inter-instrument tests. 3. The effects of tilt at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees were carried out on six monitors. RESULTS Intra-instrument coefficients of variation (CV) never exceeded 2% for fast or medium speed and achieved "between run" intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.92 and 0.84 respectively. There were no significant differences between the monitors in terms of repeatability (fast: = 0.97, medium: = 0.77). Although there were significant differences between monitors in terms of mean score, inter-instrument variability did not exceed 5% at either speed. Inter-batch ICCs ranged from 0.87 to 0.98 for fast and from 0.71 to 0.99 for medium. The angle test results corresponded closely to those predicted theoretically, with a loss in mean score of only 6% when the monitor was tilted from 0 degrees to 15 degrees. CONCLUSION The CSA monitor provides a precise tool for measuring changes in acceleration in laboratory settings. Technically, the device performs well, and is likely to prove a useful tool in the assessment of physical activity in children and adults.

[1]  I. Buchan,et al.  Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  A. Prentice,et al.  Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth? , 1995, BMJ.

[5]  E. Poehlman,et al.  Effects of resistance training and endurance training on insulin sensitivity in nonobese, young women: a controlled randomized trial. , 2000, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[6]  W. Dietz The obesity epidemic in young children , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  M. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  R. Pate Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. , 1993, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[9]  K. Rothman,et al.  Preschool physical activity level and change in body fatness in young children. The Framingham Children's Study. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  R G Eston,et al.  Special Communication , 2022 .

[11]  J F Nichols,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field Validation , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  K. Janz Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  P. Freedson,et al.  Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  H J Montoye,et al.  Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.