The Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Carotid Stenosis Compared to MRA and DSA

ABSTRACT: Objective: Carotid ultrasound (US) is a screening test for patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or stroke who then undergo Digital Subtraction Angiogram (DSA) or Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA). Gold standard DSA is invasive with inherent risks and costs. MRA is an evolving technology. This study compares reliability of MRA and US modes with DSA in determining degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. Methods: A five year retrospective analysis of 140 carotid arteries from patients who had carotid US and DSA, and possibly Magnetic Resonance Angiography was undertaken. Recorded US parameters were peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and ICA/CCA peak systolic velocity ratio. The MRA and DSA parameters used NASCET technique for measuring stenosis. Statistical analysis included ROC curves and Kappa computation. Results: US grading of carotid stenosis can be made more reliable by choosing appropriate parameters. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity for stenosis > 70% in our hospital was seen at PSV > 173cm/s (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.8, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 0.70, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 0.93, kappa 0.64 and weighted kappa 0.71). MRA kappa was 0.78, (sensitivity 0.75, specificity 1.0, PPV 1.0, NPV 0.85). Conclusions: US parameters should be validated in each centre. At best, US can only approximate the accuracy of DSA, probably due to inherent limitations of this modality. Magnetic Resonance Angiography has a perfect specificity and PPV but this technique needs to be standardized. Simultaneous use of MRA and US for screening increases sensitivity to over 0.9 without compromising specificity in > 70% stenosis.

[1]  R. Herzig,et al.  Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses , 2004, European journal of neurology.

[2]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease , 2004, Stroke.

[3]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  M. Müllner,et al.  Quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex US: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  C. Marsault,et al.  Carotid Artery Stenosis: Competition between CT Angiography and MR Angiography. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[6]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Utility in Routine Clinical Practice , 2002, Stroke.

[7]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  M. Koga,et al.  Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. , 2000, Stroke.

[10]  J. Pruvo,et al.  Recent advances in magnetic resonance angiography of carotid and vertebral arteries. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[11]  N. Rich,et al.  Determination of 60% or Greater Carotid Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Ultrasound with Conventional Angiography , 1998, Annals of vascular surgery.

[12]  R N Bryan,et al.  Practice guidelines for the use of imaging in transient ischemic attacks and acute stroke. A report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. , 1997, Stroke.

[13]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Grading carotid stenosis with ultrasound. An interlaboratory comparison. , 1997, Stroke.

[14]  W. Zwiebel.  New Doppler parameters for carotid stenosis. , 1997, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[15]  F. Lexa,et al.  Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. , 1996, Stroke.

[16]  V. Hachinski,et al.  Angiographic Detection of Carotid Plaque Ulceration: Comparison With Surgical Observations in a Multicenter Study , 1994, Stroke.

[17]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[18]  T. Riles,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Conventional Angiography, and Duplex Scanning , 1992, Stroke.

[19]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  L. Wilkins.  North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. , 1991, Stroke.

[21]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Study design for randomized prospective trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic atherosclerosis. The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Group. , 1989, Stroke.

[22]  A. Fox,et al.  Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. , 1987, Stroke.

[23]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[24]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. , 1995, JAMA.

[25]  G. Moneta,et al.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  J. Cohen.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.