Theatre Online: The design and drama of e‐learning

Theatre and drama are areas of performance and inquiry which usually assume engagement and commitment to the ensemble or group process, supported by strong individual input. How can this “dynamic” be brought into a fully online distance course? In this article we analyse and reflect on the design and implementation of an online theatre studies course using theatrical metaphors to consider the mise‐en‐scène, students’ entrances and exits into the online space, their solo and ensemble work, and the importance of “teaching presence.” Attention is paid to fostering a “course dynamic” that echoes the social world of the learners. The action research undertaken indicates that a fully online course can be as engaging, interesting, and innovative as any course designed for more traditional settings.

[1]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching 2nd Edition: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2002 .

[2]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  A Constructivist Model of Mentoring, Coaching, and Facilitating Online Discussions , 2005 .

[3]  Elizabeth Stacey,et al.  Reflections on Teaching and Learning Online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross‐global perspective , 2005 .

[4]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Factors influencing quality online learning experiences , 2003, Quality Education @ a Distance.

[5]  Catherine McLoughlin.  Achieving excellence in teaching through scaffolding learner competence , 2004 .

[6]  Leanne Cameron.  Teaching with technology : using online chat to promote effective in-class discussions , 2006 .

[7]  Bijan B. Gillani.  Learning Theories and the Design of E-Learning Environments , 2003 .

[8]  Eric Ras,et al.  Learning Spaces , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[9]  Maria M. Delgado.  In Contact With the Gods?: Directors Talk Theatre , 1997 .

[10]  Jillian Kinzie,et al.  Creating Learning Centered Classrooms. What Does Learning Theory Have To Say? ERIC Digest. , 1998 .

[11]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[12]  J. Garrison.  Deweyan Pragmatism and the Epistemology of Contemporary Social Constructivism , 1995 .

[13]  K. Lai,et al.  Synchronous Communication and Higher-Order Thinking in a Tertiary Course in Occupational Therapy , 2003 .

[14]  Tiffany A. Koszalka,et al.  Designing online courses: A taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education , 2004 .

[15]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[16]  Viola Spolin.  Improvisation for the Theater , 1963 .

[17]  A. Sorensen E. K. Fjuk.  Drama as a methaphor for design of situated, collaborative distributed learning , 1997 .

[18]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[19]  Ray Archee.  Analysing Mediated Group Interaction: an Interpretive Approach , 2004 .

[20]  Mark Childs,et al.  Videoconferencing in Theatre and Performance Studies , 2003 .

[21]  Elsebeth Korsgaard Sorensen,et al.  Drama as a Metaphor for the Design of Situated , 1997 .

[22]  P. Uys.  Critical Success Factors in The Infusion of Instructional Technologies for open Learning in Development Settings: The Case of the University of Botswana , 2003 .

[23]  Hubert Vogten,et al.  Implementing Learning Design to supportweb-based learning , 2004, WWW 2004.

[24]  Betty Collis.  Telematics-Supported Education for Traditional Universities in Europe , 2008 .