Leveraging Social Software for Community Development at Events

networking is a primary goal of people attending conferences and events. Over the past year we have develop online social networking and community tool for events, Pathable, to help attendees meet the right people. Pathable provides an online directory of attendee profiles, communication tools, and a recommendation system optimized to help people find eac based on commonalities. We performed a questionnaire study at a pathable-enabled event to assess the importance of social networking, and found that quality of conversations and sense of community were strong predictors of who said they w year after year. In addition, the more people used Pathable to meet others at the event, the greater their event attachment and sense of community. Based on lessons learned from an of seventeen Pathable-enabled events, we provide guidelin leveraging social software to optimize professional networking and community development at events.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Recommending collaboration with social networks: a comparative evaluation , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  Derek Wilkinson,et al.  The Multidimensional Nature of Social Cohesion: Psychological Sense of Community, Attraction, and Neighboring , 2007, American journal of community psychology.

[5]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[6]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Social matching: A framework and research agenda , 2005, TCHI.

[7]  M.,et al.  Sense of community: A definition and theory , 1986 .

[8]  S. M. McCune,et al.  American Behavioral Scientist , 1977 .

[9]  G. Breeuwsma.  Geruchten als besmettelijke ziekte. Het succesverhaal van de Hush Puppies. Bespreking van Malcolm Gladwell, The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company, 2000 , 2000 .

[10]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[11]  Thomas N. Garavan,et al.  Studying HRD Practitioners: A Social Capital Model , 2005 .

[12]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  A Cup of Coffee With a Dash of Love , 2007 .

[13]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[14]  Anita L. Blanchard.  Developing a Sense of Virtual Community Measure , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Scott Counts,et al.  Incorporating physical co-presence at events into digital social networking , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[17]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces: experiences at an academic conference , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[18]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[19]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Lisbeth T. Pike,et al.  Can sense of community inform social capital? , 2005 .

[22]  P. Kollock.  DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR ONLINE COMMUNITIES , 1997 .

[23]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Correlates of Networking Behavior for Managerial and Professional Employees , 2001 .

[24]  Ray Oldenburg,et al.  The Great Good Place , 1999 .

[25]  S. Mann.  Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[26]  Salvatore Parise.  Knowledge Management and Human Resource Development: An Application in Social Network Analysis Methods , 2007 .

[27]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Proactive displays: Supporting awareness in fluid social environments , 2008, TCHI.