Children's Memory for News: A Comparison of Three Presentation Media

A study was conducted to compare children's learning of news information from television versus from audio-only or printed text presentations of the same narrative content. Although previous research among adults has yielded contradictory findings, research with children has found that they consistently remember news better from television than from print. The experiment extended this work by comparing children's recall of news information from different presentation media and investigating whether the effectiveness of the different media is dependent on expectation of a memory test and the children's reading proficiency. A sample of 166 male and female 10- and 11-year-olds was presented with a sequence of news stories taken from a children's news program either in their original televised form, in soundtrack only, or in a print version. Half of the children were led to expect a memory test, and half were not. The results of the cued recall test indicated that children learned more from television news than from the print and audio versions, regardless of their reading proficiency. The advantage of television was found only for information that had been accompanied by semantically redundant pictures in the televised version, providing support for the dual-coding hypothesis

[1]  Juliette H. Walma van der Molen,et al.  Children's and Adults' Recall of Television and Print News in Children's and Adult News Formats , 2000, Commun. Res..

[2]  J. W. V. D. Molen.  Children’s and Adults’ Recall of Television Versus Print News: Is Print Really Better? , 1998 .

[3]  Juliette H. Walma van der Molen,et al.  Children's recall of the news: TV news stories compared with three print versions , 1998 .

[4]  Juliette H. Walma van der Molen,et al.  Children's recall of television and print news : A media comparison study , 1997 .

[5]  Wolfgang Donsbach,et al.  How do text‐picture relations affect the informational effectiveness of television newscasts? , 1996 .

[6]  Melvin L. DeFleur,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Experiment on How Well Audiences Remember News Stories from Newspaper, Computer, Television, and Radio Sources , 1993 .

[7]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Television: the Public's View: 1993 , 1993 .

[8]  Tom H. A. van der Voort,et al.  Children's Recall of Televised and Printed News as a Function of Test Expectation. , 1993 .

[9]  Lucinda D. Davenport,et al.  Audience Recall of News Stories Presented by Newspaper, Computer, Television and Radio , 1992 .

[10]  D. Pramer.  Communication and comprehension , 1992, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[11]  T. Grimes,et al.  Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity , 1991 .

[12]  Robert H. Wicks,et al.  Learning from News: Effects of Message Consistency and Medium on Recall and Inference Making , 1991 .

[13]  Tom H. A. van der Voort,et al.  Recall and language usage in retellings of televised and printed stories , 1991 .

[14]  George Comstock,et al.  Television and the American child , 1991 .

[15]  Doris A. Graber,et al.  Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news , 1990 .

[16]  T. Grimes,et al.  Audio-video correspondence and its role in attention and memory , 1990 .

[17]  Johannes W. J. Beentjes,et al.  Learning from television and books: A dutch replication study based on salomon's model , 1989 .

[18]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Language, speech, and print: Some asymmetries in the acquisition of literacy. , 1987 .

[19]  Janis Peacock Bellack,et al.  Mind and Media: The effects of television, video games, and computers , 1986 .

[20]  Olle Findahl,et al.  Some characteristics of news memory and comprehension , 1985 .

[21]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Sex, Presentation Mode and Memory for Violent and Non‐violent News , 1985 .

[22]  Cynthia A. Char.  Stories through sound : children's comprehension of radio stories and the role of sound effects and music in story comprehension , 1985 .

[23]  Ariella Lehrer,et al.  The relationship between reading and cognitive processing of television and radio , 1984 .

[24]  G. Salomon.  Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .

[25]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Predispositions about Learning from Print and Television. , 1984 .

[26]  B Gunter,et al.  MEMORY FOR THE NEWS AS A FUNCTION OF THE CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION , 1984 .

[27]  Stephen D. Reese.  Visual‐verbal redundancy effects on television news learning , 1984 .

[28]  Colin Berry.  Learning from television news: A critique of the research , 1983 .

[29]  K Pezdek,et al.  Children's television viewing: attention and comprehension of auditory versus visual information. , 1983, Child development.

[30]  Jessica Beagles-Roos,et al.  Specific impact of radio and television on children's story comprehension. , 1983 .

[31]  C. Berry.  A Dual Effect of Pictorial Enrichment in Learning from Television News: Gunter's data revisited , 1983 .

[32]  Richard Frost,et al.  Recall and learning from broadcast news: Is print better? , 1981 .

[33]  Richard Frost,et al.  Recall and Comprehension of Radio News in Kenya , 1980 .

[34]  Joseph H. Danks,et al.  Reading and understanding , 1980 .

[35]  E. Lorch,et al.  The relationship of visual attention to children's comprehension of television. , 1979, Child development.

[36]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Media and Symbol Systems as Related to Cognition and Learning. , 1979 .

[37]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Ann D. Rubin.  A Theoretical Taxonomy of the Differences between Oral and Written Language. Technical Report No. 35. , 2017 .

[39]  Karen Browne.  Comparison of Factual Recall from Film and Print Stimuli , 1978 .

[40]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .

[41]  Ragnhild Söderbergh.  Language by ear and by eye , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[42]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[43]  T. Sticht.  Auding and reading: A developmental model. , 1974 .

[44]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  Modality effects in word identification , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[45]  C. Edward Wilson,et al.  The Effect of Medium on Loss of Information , 1974 .

[46]  A. Paivio.  Mental imagery in associative learning and memory , 1969 .

[47]  K. Goodman.  Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .

[48]  Charles Carpenter Fries,et al.  Linguistics and reading , 1964 .

[49]  A. Paivio,et al.  LEARNING OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN PAIRED ASSOCIATES AS A FUNCTION OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN WORD ORDER AND NOUN ABSTRACTNESS. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[50]  H. Mosse.  The Psychology and Teaching of Reading , 1963 .

[51]  Bruce H. Westley,et al.  Comparative teaching effectiveness of radio and television , 1959 .

[52]  P. C. Beam.  The Language Of Art , 1958 .

[53]  H. D. Goldberg.  LIKING AND RETENTION OF A SIMULCAST , 1950 .