Knowledge sharing community in P2P network: a study of motivational perspective

How to effectively share knowledge within organizations has been given a great deal of attention in practice as well as in research. However, most of current approaches are based on the centralized network structure, e.g. a central knowledge repository, which has been considered inappropriate and ineffective to facilitate the process of knowledge sharing. On the contrary, in this study, we propose the idea of a virtual knowledge sharing community that is based on decentralized P2P technology. In the community, each member plays an equal role of knowledge producing, receiving and coordinating. We believe that decentralized P2P has many distinct advantages in knowledge sharing. Moreover, referring to relevant psychological studies on human motivation, four application features for the virtual knowledge sharing community are further proposed. After being applied, each of the features is believed to have capability of motivating the members of community to share knowledge with each other.

[1]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[2]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  P2P Networking: An Information-Sharing Alternative , 2001, Computer.

[4]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  M. Hoffman.  Is altruism part of human nature , 1981 .

[6]  Eytan Adar,et al.  Free Riding on Gnutella , 2000, First Monday.

[7]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[8]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Knowledge and the concept of trust , 1998 .

[9]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[10]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[11]  Petra Schubert,et al.  Virtual Communities of Transaction: The Role of Personalization in Electronic Commerce , 2000, Electron. Mark..

[12]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[13]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Learning from strategic success and failure , 1987 .

[14]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[15]  U. Lechner,et al.  The community model of content management: A case study of the music industry , 2001 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[17]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[18]  G. Krogh.  Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[19]  C. Ruppel,et al.  Sharing knowledge through intranets: a study of organizational culture and intranet implementation , 2001 .

[20]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Chapter 3 – Informal Networks: The Company , 1997 .