Comparison of Empirical and Ray-Tracing Models for Mobile Communication Systems at 2.6 GHz
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Theodore S. Rappaport,et al. Investigation and Comparison of 3GPP and NYUSIM Channel Models for 5G Wireless Communications , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).
[2] Theodore S. Rappaport,et al. Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Urban Micro- and Macro-Cellular Scenarios , 2015, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).
[3] Dirk Grunwald,et al. A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[4] Vittorio Degli-Esposti,et al. Ray Tracing RF Field Prediction: An Unforgiving Validation , 2015 .
[5] Zaher Dawy,et al. Planning Wireless Cellular Networks of Future: Outlook, Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, IEEE Access.
[6] Yasushi Takatori,et al. Path loss frequency dependence at 2–26 GHz in an urban macro cell environment , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.
[7] Matteo Artuso,et al. Drive Test Minimization Using Deep Learning with Bayesian Approximation , 2018, 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).
[8] Huan Nguyen,et al. Path Loss, Shadow Fading, and Line-of-Sight Probability Models for 5G Urban Macro-Cellular Scenarios , 2015, 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).