Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology

This study investigated their views concerning evidence and expert opinion of 10th‐grade students, accessed by an open‐ended questionnaire in the context of a socio‐scientific issue: the cause of flood disasters, and personal epistemology identified by the Learning Environment Preference Questionnaire (LEP). Students' responses to the open‐ended questions showed that when thinking about the flood issue, most students rely heavily on direct and numerical data to draw their conclusions, while experts represented a source of conclusive information. The LEP scores indicated that, in terms of epistemological development, students were mostly at the stage of the ‘multiplicists’ in Perry's model. The statistical analysis suggested that view towards evidence and expert were associated with personal epistemology.

[1]  Karen Strohm Kitchner.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[2]  O. R. Anderson,et al.  Senior high school students' preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use , 2003 .

[3]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[4]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas , 2002 .

[5]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[6]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development , 1992 .

[7]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  Are epistemological beliefs similar across domains , 1995 .

[8]  R. Glaser.  Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[9]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[10]  Scott A Miller,et al.  Cognitive development, 3rd ed. , 1993 .

[11]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[12]  William S. Moore.  The Learning Environment Preferences: Exploring the Construct Validity of an Objective Measure of th , 1989 .

[13]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al.  Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management , 2002 .

[14]  Kathleen Hogan.  Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science , 2000 .

[15]  Fang-Ying Yang,et al.  Exploring high school students' use of theory and evidence in an everyday context: the role of scientific thinking in environmental science decision‐making , 2004 .

[16]  Marlene Schommer.  Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. , 1993 .

[17]  John Leach,et al.  Epistemological Understanding in Science Learning: The Consistency of Representations across Contexts. , 2000 .

[18]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[19]  Joan Solomon,et al.  STS education : international perspectives on reform , 1994 .

[20]  David Randle,et al.  The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students , 2001 .

[21]  O. R. Anderson,et al.  A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents' narrative using science content , 1993 .

[22]  H. Siegel.  Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education , 1988 .

[23]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[24]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[25]  D. Kuhn.  A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[26]  Yvonne J. Meichtry.  The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science , 1993 .

[27]  J. Baron.  Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[28]  R. Yager.  Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education. , 1996 .

[29]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[30]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[31]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue , 2004 .

[32]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[33]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[34]  G. Aikenhead.  High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. III. Characteristics and limitations of scientific knowledge , 1987 .

[35]  William W. Cobern,et al.  College Students' Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis. , 1993 .

[36]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[37]  D. Perkins.  Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective. , 1989 .

[38]  Charles R. Barman,et al.  High School Students' Views about the Nature of Science: Results from Three Countries , 1995 .

[39]  Ala Samarapungavan,et al.  Children's judgments in theory choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood , 1992, Cognition.

[40]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[41]  B. Hofer.  Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching , 2001 .

[42]  R. Soden,et al.  Critical thinking in education: a review , 2000 .

[43]  K. Kortland.  An STS case study about students' decision making on the waste issue , 1996 .