Towards Interoperable Reporting Standards for Omics Data: Hopes and Hurdles

BACKGROUND As the size and complexity of scientific datasets and the corresponding information stores grow, standards for collecting, describing, formatting, submitting and exchanging information are playing an increasingly active role. Several initiatives occupy strategic positions in the international scenario, both within and across domains. However, the job of harmonising reporting standards is still very much a work in progress; both software interoperability and the data integration remain challenging as things stand. RESULTS The status quo with respect to standardization initiatives is summarized here, with particular emphasis on the motivation for, and the challenges of, ongoing synergistic activities amongst the academic community focused on the creation of truly interoperable standards. CONCLUSIONS Groups generating standards should engage with ongoing cross-domain activities to simplify the integration of heterogeneous data sets to the greatest possible extent.

[1]  Thorsten Henrich,et al.  Minimum information specification for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry experiments (MISFISHIE) , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  The Functional Genomics Experiment model (FuGE): an extensible framework for standards in functional genomics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Alvis Brazma,et al.  MGED standards: work in progress. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[4]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  The Metabolomics Standards Initiative , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Felix W Frueh,et al.  Impact of microarray data quality on genomic data submissions to the FDA , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Hugh D. Spence,et al.  Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM) , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Democratizing proteomics data , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Standardizing data , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  The first RSBI (ISA-TAB) workshop: "can a simple format work for complex studies?". , 2008, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[12]  Weida Tong,et al.  An integrated bioinformatics infrastructure essential for advancing pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine in the context of the FDA's Critical Path Initiative. , 2007, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[13]  African Lungfish,et al.  Standard operating procedures , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Lennart Martens,et al.  The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Summary recommendations for standardization and reporting of metabolic analyses , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Amnon Shabo,et al.  Clinical genomics data standards for pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics. , 2006, Pharmacogenomics.