Experimental Study of Large Area Suspended Ceilings

ABSTRACT Damage of nonstructural components during past seismic events was shown to be not only a critical threat to life safety in extreme cases but also led to substantial reduction of functionality of buildings and other facilities. Because of the complex construction of nonstructural and architectural components, current standards provide only limited guidance for the seismic design. Suspended ceiling systems are among the less understood important nonstructural/architectural components in buildings for which design standards provide limited guidance. To understand the dynamic behavior of suspended ceiling systems, a series of full scale shake table tests of 20 ft × 53 ft and 20 ft × 20 ft ceiling systems were conducted at the Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation laboratory (SEESL) at University at Buffalo (UB). For the full scale dynamic testing, a new test frame providing a continuous suspended ceiling area of 1,060 ft2 was constructed on the tandem shake tables and was equipped with an open-loop shake table compensation procedure. The combined designs of the physical frame and of the shake table motion controllers allowed simulating the required floor/roof motion according to ICC-ES AC156 standard at the roof of the test structure. Various test configurations were selected in order to determine the influence of different system conditions and the effects or efficiency of various protective systems required by the current standard ASTM E580 for seismic design. Based on the test data and the failure mechanisms observed, damage states are defined, and fragility curves are developed. The results of the fragility analysis show that a ceiling system becomes more vulnerable as (a) it is subjected to multi-directional input motions, (b) heavier tiles are installed, (c) the size of a ceiling area increases, and (d) lateral restraints are not installed. In addition, simplified numerical models that can capture the special behavior of ceiling systems are developed and presented in a companion paper. This paper presents the experimental study of large area suspended ceiling systems involving test setup and configurations, test motions generated by a unique control system, and basic lessons gained from the experiments.

[1]  Siavash Soroushian,et al.  System-Level Experiments on Ceiling/Piping/Partition Systems at UNR- NEES Site , 2014 .

[2]  M. Pianigiani Seismic evaluation of suspended ceilings in a hospital building: a case study , 2014 .

[3]  Tomohiro Sasaki,et al.  Seismic Simulation of an Integrated Ceiling-Partition Wall-Piping System at E-Defense. I: Three-Dimensional Structural Response and Base Isolation , 2016 .

[4]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Shake table tests for seismic assessment of suspended continuous ceilings , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[5]  Eunsoo Choi,et al.  Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone , 2003 .

[6]  Siavash Soroushian,et al.  Capacity Evaluation of Suspended Ceiling-Perimeter Attachments , 2016 .

[7]  A. Zaghi,et al.  Seismic Fragility of Suspended Ceiling Systems , 2012 .

[8]  Arash E. Zaghi,et al.  Analytical Simulation of the Performance of Ceiling-Sprinkler Systems in Shake Table Tests Performed on a Full-Scale 5-Story Building , 2014 .

[9]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Analytical Study of Large-Area Suspended Ceilings , 2019 .

[10]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Seismic performance of non-structural components and contents in buildings: an overview of NZ research , 2016, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[11]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Fragility of Suspended Ceiling Systems , 2007 .

[13]  Siavash Soroushian,et al.  Axial Capacity Evaluation for Typical Suspended Ceiling Joints , 2016 .

[14]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Seismic Simulation of an Integrated Ceiling-Partition Wall-Piping System at E-Defense. II: Evaluation of Nonstructural Damage and Fragilities , 2016 .

[15]  Siavash Soroushian,et al.  Capacity Evaluation of Suspended Ceiling Components, Part 2: Analytical Studies , 2015 .

[16]  R. Blevins,et al.  Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape , 1984 .

[17]  George C. Yao SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF DIRECT HUNG SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[18]  Ki Pung Ryu Modeling and seismic evaluation of nonstructural components: Testing frame for experimental evaluation of suspended ceiling systems , 2010 .

[19]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Earthquake Simulator Testing and Seismic Evaluation of Suspended Ceilings , 2010 .

[20]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Simulation of floor response spectra in shake table experiments , 2011 .

[21]  Tara C. Hutchinson,et al.  Full-Scale Structural and Nonstructural Building System Performance during Earthquakes and Post-Earthquake Fire , 2013 .

[22]  Siavash Soroushian,et al.  Capacity Evaluation of Suspended Ceiling Components, Part 1: Experimental Studies , 2015 .

[23]  T. Igusa,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering by Anil K. Chopra , 1996 .