The Effect of Visual Gender on Abuse in Conversation with ECAs

Previous studies have shown that female ECAs are more likely to be abused than male agents, which may cement gender stereotypes. In the study reported in this paper a visually androgynous ECA in the form of a teachable agent in an educational math game was compared with a female and male agent. The results confirm that female agents are more prone to be verbally abused than male agents, but also show that the visually androgynous agent was less abused than the female although more than the male agent. A surprising finding was that very few students asked the visually androgynous agent whether it was a boy or a girl. These results suggest that androgyny may be a way to keep both genders represented, which is especially important in pedagogical settings, simultaneously lowering the abusive behavior and perhaps most important, loosen the connection between gender and abuse.

[1]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning , 2009 .

[2]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions , 2008 .

[3]  Lena Pareto,et al.  A teachable-agent-based game affording collaboration and competition: evaluating math comprehension and motivation , 2012 .

[4]  N. Betz,et al.  An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence , 1989 .

[5]  Aaron Doering,et al.  When sex, drugs, and violence enter the classroom: Conversations between adolescents and a female pedagogical agent , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Conversational Agents , 2011 .

[7]  Annika Silvervarg,et al.  Extending a Teachable Agent with a Social Conversation Module - Effects on Student Experiences and Learning , 2011, AIED.

[8]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Relational Agents Improve Engagement and Learning in Science Museum Visitors , 2011, IVA.

[10]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? , 2009, IVA.

[11]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of agent appearance on female choice , 2005, AIED.

[12]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Sex Stereotypes and Conversational Agents , 2006 .

[13]  K. Blair Pedagogical agents for learning by teaching: Teachable agents , 2007 .

[14]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Gender affordances of conversational agents , 2012, Interacting with computers.

[15]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[16]  Edson P. Pimentel,et al.  Artificial Intelligence MArkup Language: A Brief Tutorial , 2013, ArXiv.

[17]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Visual Stereotypes and Virtual Pedagogical Agents , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Teachable Agents: Combining Insights from Learning Theory and Computer Science , 1999 .