Rapid method for thermal dose‐based safety supervision during MR scans

To maximize diagnostic accuracy and minimize costs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners expose patients to electromagnetic exposure levels well above the established maximum, but in a well-controlled environment. In this paper, we discuss a novel safety assessment model that offers maximum flexibility while ensuring no local tissue damage due to radiofrequency induced heating occurs. This model is based on the cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) thermal dose concept, which naturally considers exposure duration, tissue sensitivity and the transient nature of heating, and permits rapid assessment of exposure safety of a given MRI scan using information about the transient specific absorption rate (SAR). It builds upon theoretical considerations (e.g., relating peak temperatures in the presence and absence of local thermoregulation) as well as data extracted from simulations involving anatomical models (e.g., to determine the characteristic time of temperature changes). The model is capable of predicting CEM43 for patients with either uncompromised thermoregulation or absent thermoregulation. The model predictions approximate detailed simulations well and results illustrate the importance of adequately considering changes in perfusion. The model presented herein offers an MRI safety assessment approach that overcomes problems associated with traditional SAR-based limits. Its limitations and the associated uncertainties are discussed together with remaining open questions.

[1]  E. Neufeld,et al.  Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[2]  P. J. Hoopes,et al.  Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia , 2003, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[3]  W. Dewey,et al.  Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic , 2009, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[4]  Gregor Adriany,et al.  Radiofrequency heating in porcine models with a “large” 32 cm internal diameter, 7 T (296 MHz) head coil , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Dirk Diehl,et al.  Evaluation of MR-Induced Hot Spots for Different Temporal SAR Modes Using a Time-Dependent Finite Difference Method With Explicit Temperature Gradient Treatment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Dominant factors affecting temperature rise in simulations of human thermoregulation during RF exposure , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels? , 2013, European Radiology.

[8]  A. Hirata,et al.  Correlation of maximum temperature increase and peak SAR in the human head due to handset antennas , 2003 .

[9]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  S. B. Field,et al.  The relationship between heating time and temperature: its relevance to clinical hyperthermia. , 1983, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Analysis of the local worst-case SAR exposure caused by an MRI multi-transmit body coil in anatomical models of the human body , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Thermal Tissue Damage Model Analyzed for Different Whole‐Body SAR and Scan Durations for Standard MR Body Coils , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  E Atalar,et al.  A Green's function approach to local rf heating in interventional MRI. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  J. Herbertz Comment on the ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998, Health physics.

[15]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Thresholds for thermal damage to normal tissues: An update , 2011, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[16]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Local tissue temperature increase of a generic implant compared to the basic restrictions defined in safety guidelines , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[17]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Whole‐body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5T MR body coil , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J F Bakker,et al.  Children and adults exposed to electromagnetic fields at the ICNIRP reference levels: theoretical assessment of the induced peak temperature increase , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J V Hajnal,et al.  Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  W. Dewey,et al.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Chieko Azuma,et al.  Using units of CEM 43°C T90, local hyperthermia thermal dose can be delivered as prescribed , 2000 .