Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.

Previous studies have assessed the importance of temporal fine structure (TFS) for speech perception in noise by comparing the performance of normal-hearing listeners in two conditions. In one condition, the stimuli have useful information in both their temporal envelopes and their TFS. In the other condition, stimuli are vocoded and contain useful information only in their temporal envelopes. However, these studies have confounded differences in TFS with differences in the temporal envelope. The present study manipulated the analytic signal of stimuli to preserve the temporal envelope between conditions with different TFS. The inclusion of informative TFS improved speech-reception thresholds for sentences presented in steady and modulated noise, demonstrating that there are significant benefits of including informative TFS even when the temporal envelope is controlled. It is likely that the results of previous studies largely reflect the benefits of TFS, rather than uncontrolled effects of changes in the temporal envelope.

[1]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release , 2008, Hearing Research.

[4]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[7]  B. Moore The Role of Temporal Fine Structure Processing in Pitch Perception, Masking, and Speech Perception for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired People , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  A. Macleod,et al.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[9]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P. D. Oldham,et al.  A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjects. , 1962, Journal of chronic diseases.

[12]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[16]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.