Methods for testing familial aggregation of diseases in population‐based samples: application to hodgkin lymphoma in swedish registry data

We use data on lymphoma in families of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cases from the Swedish Family Cancer Database ( Hemminki et al. 2001 ) to illustrate survival methods for detecting familial aggregation in first degree relatives of case probands compared to first degree relatives of control probands, from registries that permit sampling of all cases. Because more than one case may occur in a given family, the first degree relatives of case probands are not necessarily independent, and we present procedures that allow for such dependence. A bootstrap procedure also accommodates matching of case and control probands by resampling the matching clusters, defined as the combined set of all first degree relatives of the matched case and control probands. Regarding families as independent sampling units leads to inferences based on “sandwich variance estimators” and accounts for dependencies from having more than one proband in a family, but not for matching. We compare these methods in analysis of familial aggregation of HL and also present simulations to compare survival analyses with analyses of binary outcome data.

[1]  M. Gail,et al.  Familial aggregation of Hodgkin lymphoma and related tumors , 2004, Cancer.

[2]  N. Chatterjee,et al.  Analysis of Survival Data from Case–Control Family Studies , 2002, Biometrics.

[3]  Xinjun Li,et al.  Increased cancer risk in the offspring of women with colorectal carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[4]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Familial risks in invasive and in situ cervical cancer by histological type , 2001, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[5]  L. Zhao,et al.  On dependence estimation using correlated failure time data from case-control family studies , 1999 .

[6]  T M Therneau,et al.  rhDNase as an example of recurrent event analysis. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  M H Skolnick,et al.  Systematic population-based assessment of cancer risk in first-degree relatives of cancer probands. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  X H Liu,et al.  The Cox proportional hazards model with change point: an epidemiologic application. , 1990, Biometrics.

[9]  D. Oakes,et al.  Bivariate survival models induced by frailties , 1989 .

[10]  K. Hemminki,et al.  The nation-wide Swedish family-cancer database--updated structure and familial rates. , 2001, Acta oncologica.

[11]  G. Vogler,et al.  Estimating effects of probands' characteristics on familial risk: I. Adjustment for censoring and correlated ages at onset , 1991, Genetic epidemiology.

[12]  T. Beaty,et al.  Measuring familial aggregation by using odds‐ratio regression models , 1991, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  L. J. Wei,et al.  Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions , 1989 .