Pilot study of the implementation of G8 screening tool, Cognitive screening assessment and Chemotherapy Toxicity assessment in older adults with cancer in a Tertiary University Hospital in Ireland.

BACKGROUND Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended by international guidelines prior to initiation of systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT). In practice, CGA is limited by time constraints, lack of resources and expert interpretation. AIMS The primary objective of this pilot study was to establish the prevalence of frailty (assessed by G8), cognitive impairment (assessed by Mini-Cog), and risk of chemotherapy toxicity (assessed by CARG Chemo-Toxicity Calculator) among patients (pts) ≥65 years commencing SACT. We selected these three screening tools due to the ease of conducting them in a busy outpatient setting. In addition, they have been validated to predict frailty and risk of toxicity from SACT among older adults with cancer. METHODS Eligible participants were identified from medical oncology clinics. Assessments were conducted in an outpatient setting by treating physicians. Pt records were reviewed to gather demographic and cancer details. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS Sixty-three participants were enrolled. The mean age of participants was 73yrs (range=65-88). Thirty-three (52.4%) were female and 30 (47.6%) were male. The majority (n=38, 60.3%) had metastatic cancer. The mean G8 score was 11.9 (range=6-19). Eighty-three percent had a G8 score ≤14. Mini-Cog was positive in 13 pts (21%). The mean CARG score was 7.5 (range=0-16), and 80% had a risk of at least 50% grade ≥3 toxicity. Of these, 48 (76.2%) received chemotherapy and 15 (23.8%) received non-cytotoxic SACT. In multi-variate analyses, age, cancer type, treatment type, and disease stage did not impact G8, Mini-Cog, or CARG scores. CONCLUSIONS Our study has several limitations but suggests that the majority of older adults with cancer would qualify for formal CGA assessment. The risk of high-grade toxicity from SACT is substantial in this cohort. Chronological age was not found to negatively impact pts' frailty, cognition, or risk of toxicity.

[1]  P. Lynch,et al.  Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults Optimized by Geriatric Assessment and Intervention: A Non-Comparative Analysis , 2022, Current oncology.

[2]  J. Garin,et al.  Inside the Black Box: A Narrative Review on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment-Driven Interventions in Older Adults with Cancer , 2022, Cancers.

[3]  Wee-Kheng Soo,et al.  Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review , 2021, Current oncology.

[4]  M. Fakih,et al.  Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[5]  K. Vistisen,et al.  The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO) , 2021, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  S. Alibhai,et al.  Downstream consequences of abnormal cognitive screening in older adults seen pretreatment in a geriatric oncology clinic. , 2019, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[7]  C. Bellera,et al.  A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer. , 2019, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[8]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Cancer mortality in the elderly in 11 countries worldwide, 1970-2015. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  S. Sourdet,et al.  Impact of the comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decision in geriatric oncology , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[10]  R. West,et al.  Older age is associated with less cancer treatment: a longitudinal study of English cancer patients , 2018, Age and ageing.

[11]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer. , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[12]  A. Farcomeni,et al.  Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the PreMiO study , 2017, Oncotarget.

[13]  Chikashi Ishioka,et al.  The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  S. Mohile,et al.  Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric oncology. , 2016, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[15]  P. Selby,et al.  The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations†. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  M. Steinman,et al.  Polypharmacy and the management of the older cancer patient. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  Dan Liu,et al.  Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with lung cancer. , 2013, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[19]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  S. Mathoulin-Pélissier,et al.  Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  P. Newcomb,et al.  Cancer treatment and age: patient perspectives. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  J. Walston,et al.  How should older adults with cancer be evaluated for frailty? , 2017, Journal of geriatric oncology.