Supraglottal Air Pressure in the Production of English Stops

Generally higher levels of intra-oral air pressure during occlusion are regularly reported for English /p,t,k/ as compared with /b,d,g/, and considerable significance has been attached to such observations, particularly by phonologists. Many of the published bodies of data, however, represent quite limited speech samples, consisting in the main of short nonsense utterances which contain stops in only a few contextual situations. In the present study ten readings of a list of twenty short English phrases were recorded for a single speaker. The phrases contained stops in initial, medial and final positions, and under various conditions of stress. A pressure transducer mounted at the end of a nasal catheter was introduced into the pharynx, and variations in intra-oral pressure were recorded on a multi-channel penwriter. From the pressure records obtained it appeared that /p,t,k/ and /b,d,g/ differ in their mean peak pressures, but that this difference is not equally significant in all contexts. Both initially and medially before a stressed vowel the two categories show peak pressures that overlap very extensively. This makes questionable the view that such differences more regularly co-exist with the /p,t,k/:/b,d,g/ distinction than any difference in voicing or mode of laryngeal operation, and that they demonstrate the " fortis ":" lenis " nature of the distinction.

[1]  K. Harris,et al.  Some Aspects of the Production of Oral and Nasal Labial Stops , 1965, Language and speech.

[2]  L. Lisker,et al.  Some Effects of Context On Voice Onset Time in English Stops , 1967, Language and speech.

[3]  Naoaki Yanagihara,et al.  An Aerodynamic Study of the Articulatory Mechanism in the Production of Bilabial Stop Consonants , 1966 .

[4]  J. W. Black,et al.  The pressure component in the production of consonants. , 1950, The Journal of speech disorders.

[5]  A. Malécot,et al.  The Effectiveness of Intra-Oral Air-Pressure-Pulse Parameters in Distinguishing Between Stop Cognates , 1966 .

[6]  On Hultzén's “Voiceless Lenis Stops in Prevocalic Clusters” , 1963 .

[7]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[8]  R. Ringel,et al.  AIR FLOW DURING THE PRODUCTION OF SELECTED CONSONANTS. , 1964, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  D. J. Sharf,et al.  Duration of Post-Stress Intervocalic Stops and Preceding Vowels , 1962 .

[10]  J C Hardy,et al.  Peak intraoral air pressures during speech. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  DISTINCTIVE FEATURES AND LARYNGEAL CONTROL , 1971 .

[12]  E. Fischer-Jørgensen Beobachtungen über den Zusammenhang zwischen Stimmhaftigkeit und Intraoralem Luftdruck , 1963 .

[13]  F. Cooper,et al.  Transillumination of the larynx in running speech. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Xxi. Speech Communication A. Studies of the Dynamics of Speech Production , .

[15]  M. Rothenberg The Breath-Stream Dynamics of Simple-Released Plosive Production , 1968 .

[16]  L. Lisker Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English , 1957 .

[17]  Joanne D. Subtelny,et al.  Intraoral Pressure and Rate of Flow During Speech , 1966 .

[18]  A. Malécot,et al.  The Force of Articulation of American Stops and Fricatives as a Function of Position , 1968 .

[19]  A. Malécot Mechanical Pressure as an Index of ‘Force of Articulation’ , 1966 .

[20]  V A Fromkin,et al.  Neuro-Muscular Specification of Linguistic Units , 1966, Language and speech.

[21]  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FORCE OF ARTICULATION , 1955 .