Assessing Gait Adaptability in People With a Unilateral Amputation on an Instrumented Treadmill With a Projected Visual Context

Background Gait adaptability, including the ability to avoid obstacles and to take visually guided steps, is essential for safe movement through a cluttered world. This aspect of walking ability is important for regaining independent mobility but is difficult to assess in clinical practice. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the validity of an instrumented treadmill with obstacles and stepping targets projected on the belt's surface for assessing prosthetic gait adaptability. Design This was an observational study. Methods A control group of people who were able bodied (n=12) and groups of people with transtibial (n=12) and transfemoral (n=12) amputations participated. Participants walked at a self-selected speed on an instrumented treadmill with projected visual obstacles and stepping targets. Gait adaptability was evaluated in terms of anticipatory and reactive obstacle avoidance performance (for obstacles presented 4 steps and 1 step ahead, respectively) and accuracy of stepping on regular and irregular patterns of stepping targets. In addition, several clinical tests were administered, including timed walking tests and reports of incidence of falls and fear of falling. Results Obstacle avoidance performance and stepping accuracy were significantly lower in the groups with amputations than in the control group. Anticipatory obstacle avoidance performance was moderately correlated with timed walking test scores. Reactive obstacle avoidance performance and stepping accuracy performance were not related to timed walking tests. Gait adaptability scores did not differ in groups stratified by incidence of falls or fear of falling. Limitations Because gait adaptability was affected by walking speed, differences in self-selected walking speed may have diminished differences in gait adaptability between groups. Conclusions Gait adaptability can be validly assessed by use of an instrumented treadmill with a projected visual context. When walking speed is taken into account, this assessment provides unique, quantitative information about walking ability in people with a lower-limb amputation.

[1]  W. Polomski,et al.  The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[2]  Vivian Weerdesteyn,et al.  Evidence for bilaterally delayed and decreased obstacle avoidance responses while walking with a lower limb prosthesis , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Online gait event detection using a large force platform embedded in a treadmill. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  M. Hollands,et al.  Coordination of Eye and Leg Movements During Visually Guided Stepping , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  V. Wadley,et al.  Sensory and Cognitive Factors Influencing Functional Ability in Older Adults , 2005, Gerontology.

[6]  W. Berg,et al.  Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[7]  W. Miller,et al.  The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  W. Miller,et al.  The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  H Houdijk,et al.  Mind your step: metabolic energy cost while walking an enforced gait pattern. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[12]  W H Eisma,et al.  The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Physical capacity and walking ability after lower limb amputation: a systematic review , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  Joan N. Vickers,et al.  How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[17]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  Vivian Weerdesteyn,et al.  A Five-Week Exercise Program Can Reduce Falls and Improve Obstacle Avoidance in the Elderly , 2006, Gerontology.

[19]  Vivian Weerdesteyn,et al.  High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  A E Patla,et al.  Altered kinetic strategy for the control of swing limb elevation over obstacles in unilateral below-knee amputee gait. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  P. Catlin,et al.  Establishing the reliability and validity of measurements of walking time using the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[22]  A. Tennant,et al.  The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  T. Schmalz,et al.  Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: the influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[24]  Age-related differences in locomotor targeting performance under structural interference. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[25]  A L Hof,et al.  Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[26]  Milad G. Ishac,et al.  Kinematic patterns of participants with a below-knee prosthesis stepping over obstacles of various heights during locomotion , 1997 .

[27]  Rory O'Connor,et al.  Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

[28]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[29]  H. Houdijk,et al.  Variability and stability analysis of walking of transfemoral amputees. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  References , 1971 .

[31]  Paulina J. M. Bank,et al.  Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow! , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.