Enrichment of Peer Assessment with Agent Negotiation

This study presents a conceptual framework for providing intelligent supports through agent negotiation and fuzzy constraints to enhance the effectiveness of peer assessment. By using fuzzy constraints, it not only provides a flexible marking scheme to deal with the imprecision and uncertainty for the representation of assessment but also provides a computational framework to incorporate student's personal characteristics into the process for the reduction of assessment bias. Additionally, a fuzzy constraint-based negotiation mechanism is employed to coordinate the cognitive differences between students. Through iterative agent negotiation, students can reconcile the differences and reach an agreement on the assessment results. Thus, the proposed framework allows students to provide more detailed, informed, and less biased assessments for their peers' work. To demonstrate the usefulness and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a negotiation-based peer assessment system, NePAS, has been built and used in classroom. Experimental results suggested that students were more willing to accept the assessment results and able to acquire more useful information to reflect upon and revise their work. Instructors can also observe students' participation and performance to appropriately adjust instructional strategies.

[1]  Aliisa Mylonas,et al.  Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process , 2002 .

[2]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading , 2009 .

[3]  K. Lai Fuzzy constraint processing , 1992 .

[4]  Mike Joy,et al.  Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[5]  Feraidoon Raafat,et al.  An Empirical Study of Peer Bias in Evaluations: Students Rating Students , 1994 .

[6]  L Arnold,et al.  Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students. , 1981, Journal of medical education.

[7]  G. Gibbs Improving Student Learning through Assessment and Evaluation. , 1995 .

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[9]  S. Hanrahan,et al.  Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views , 2001 .

[10]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Curtis A. Carver,et al.  Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles , 1999 .

[12]  R. C. Murray,et al.  Towards a Theory of Learning During Tutoring. , 1995 .

[13]  Fang Liu,et al.  A Comparison of Learning Style Theories on the Suitability for elearning , 2005, Web Technologies, Applications, and Services.

[14]  K. Robert Lai,et al.  Modeling Agent Negotiation Via Fuzzy Constraints in E‐Business , 2004, Comput. Intell..

[15]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Manabu Ichino A Nonparametric Multiclass Pattern Classifier , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Mark Peterson,et al.  LEARNING INTERACTION IN AN AVATAR-BASED VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT: A PRELIMINARY STUDY , 2005 .

[18]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Web based peer assessment: attitude and achievement , 2001, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[19]  Gary L. May,et al.  The Effect of Social Style on Peer Evaluation Ratings in Project Teams , 2006 .

[20]  Natascha van Hattum-Janssen,et al.  Explicitness of criteria in peer assessment processes for first-year engineering students , 2006 .

[21]  Abbas Foroughi A Survey Of The Use Of Computer Support For Negotiation , 2011 .

[22]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[23]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[24]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[25]  Robert Davies,et al.  An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Michael Searby,et al.  An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University , 1997 .

[27]  Aharon Tziner,et al.  Does Conscientiousness Moderate the Relationship Between Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Performance Appraisal and Rating Behavior , 2002 .

[28]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[29]  Phil Davies,et al.  Using Student Reflective Self-Assessment for Awarding Degree Classifications , 2002 .

[30]  Abhir Bhalerao,et al.  Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study , 2001 .