Conscientiousness and Task Performance: Test of Cognitive Process Model

The purpose of this study was to examine whether the effect of the Big Five factor of conscientiousness on task performance was mediated by performance expectancy, performance valence, and goal choice. There were 117 business students who completed 6 subscales of the Personality Research Form (D. N. Jackson, 1987), responded to several self-report measures, and performed a simple arithmetic task. A cognitive process model was tested and supported through LISREL analyses. The effect of conscientiousness on task performance was mediated by performance expectancy and goal choice. Robust effects for performance valence were not observed in this situation. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

[1]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[2]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[3]  T. L. Kelley,et al.  The reliability coefficient , 1942 .

[4]  H. Klein.  Further evidence on the relationship between goal setting and expectancy theories. , 1991 .

[5]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[6]  H. Stumpf,et al.  The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: A cross-national evaluation. , 1993 .

[7]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[8]  D. Magnusson,et al.  Personality at the crossroads : current issues in interactional psychology , 1977 .

[9]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[10]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Delineating goal and efficacy effects : a test of three models , 1991 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[12]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. , 1988 .

[13]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[14]  S. M. Sales,et al.  Some effects of role overload and role underload , 1970 .

[15]  H. Garland,et al.  A cognitive mediation theory of task goals and human performance , 1985 .

[16]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[17]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology. , 1986 .

[18]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample size , 1988 .

[19]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. , 1992 .

[20]  D. Jackson,et al.  A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure , 1996 .

[21]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Perceived performance norm as a mediator in the effect of assigned goal on personal goal and task performance. , 1988 .

[22]  R. Kanfer.  Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[23]  D. Jackson,et al.  The Personality Research Form in a Canadian context: Does language make a difference? , 1976 .

[24]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  The effects of individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance , 1987 .

[25]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[26]  G. Bower,et al.  Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation , 1988 .

[27]  Jennifer A. Chatman.  Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit , 1989 .

[28]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Task Goal Attributes, n Achievement, and Supervisory Performance. Technical Report No. 30. , 1974 .

[29]  Tamao Matsui,et al.  Influence of achievement need on goal setting, performance, and feedback effectiveness. , 1982 .

[30]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[31]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[32]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[33]  D. Jackson.  Personality research form manual , 1974 .

[34]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[35]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[36]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research , 1989 .

[37]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[38]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Relationship of Goal Level to Valence and Instrumentality , 1992 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[40]  A. Bandura.  Self-Regulation of Motivation and Action Through Goal Systems , 1988 .

[41]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[42]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[43]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, GOAL DIFFICULTY, GOAL ACCEPTANCE, GOAL INSTRUMENTALITY, AND PERFORMANCE , 1978 .

[44]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[45]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. , 1987 .