The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies

This article critically approaches various neo-institutional accounts of the process of formal organizing. While acknowledging the importance of the overall orientation marked by neo-institutional studies, the article identifies several crucial aspects that have escaped the attention of neo-institutional research. In particular, it criticizes the inability of neo-institutionalism to provide an account of the means linking situated forms of organizing with wider instrumental beliefs and practices, in terms other than adaptivist, diffusionist. Such a limitation is partly a consequence of unwillingness of neo-institutionalism to focus on and analyze the very architecture of the rationalized patterns and relationships which neo-institutionalists claim to be diffusing across organizational populations and fields. Drawing on several sources, the article develops a framework that seeks to outline the conceptual means for decomposing the carriers of rationalized patterns, models and techniques and showing the distinctive ways in which they implicate the building blocks of formal organizing.

[1]  Hans Hasselbladh,et al.  Social magmas and the conventional explanatory pyramid , 1998 .

[2]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting and the construction of the governable person , 1987 .

[3]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[4]  Barbara Townley,et al.  Managing By Numbers: Accounting, Personnel Management and the Creation of a Mathesis , 1995 .

[5]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[6]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and literacy : the technologizing of the word , 1982 .

[7]  N. Rose.  Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy☆ , 1991 .

[8]  David Knights,et al.  Changing Spaces: The Disruptive Impact of a New Epistemological Location for the Study of Management , 1992 .

[9]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  WRITING, RATIONALITY AND ORGANIZATION: AN INTRODUCTION , 1996 .

[10]  A. Preston,et al.  THE BIRTH OF CLINICAL ACCOUNTING: A STUDY OF THE EMERGENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONS OF DISCOURSES ON... , 1992 .

[11]  Robert Cooper,et al.  Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 3: The Contribution of Jacques Derrida , 1989 .

[12]  Peter Miller,et al.  The Factory as Laboratory , 1994, Science in Context.

[13]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[14]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[15]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness , 1986 .

[16]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Computer-based technology and the constitution of work: a study on the cognitive foundations of work , 1999 .

[17]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[18]  Keith Hoskin,et al.  Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power☆ , 1986 .

[19]  Ali Yakhlef.  IT Outsourcing and the Construction of Accountable Worlds , 1998 .