Low false positive and accurate detection of yeast cell viability and concentration using an automatic staining and lensfree imaging platform.

Yeast cell viability and concentration are the crucial factors affecting product quality in food industry and bio-fuel production, as well as the evaluation basis for environmental toxic compounds. To overcome the drawbacks of existing methods, including high error, false positive and low automation, we propose a highly accurate approach based on an automatic staining and high-throughput lensfree imaging platform. A precisely controlled staining process is implemented automatically, which largely avoids the error caused by inappropriate exposure times. Based on optical simulation analysis, energy distribution characteristics are proposed. They are better with steady theoretical evidence for live yeast cell recognition. The parameters are directly extracted from raw cell fingerprints without any reconstruction. Those progresses improve robustness and increase efficiency. Availability of this approach is validated by compared the detection results with gold-standard PI counting method in a H2O2 toxicity test. So it is expected to be widely used in industrial production and environmental toxicity assessment.

[1]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Live cell refractometry using Hilbert phase microscopy and confocal reflectance microscopy. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[2]  Chang-Hyun Oh,et al.  Low-cost telemedicine device performing cell and particle size measurement based on lens-free shadow imaging technology. , 2015, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  António Candeias,et al.  Development of a Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization protocol for analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria , 2016 .

[4]  Dongmin Seo,et al.  A simple and low-cost device performing blood cell counting based on lens-free shadow imaging technique , 2014 .

[5]  Jean Qiu,et al.  Direct concentration and viability measurement of yeast in corn mash using a novel imaging cytometry method , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[6]  Elizabeth J Lodolo,et al.  The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae- the main character in beer brewing. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[7]  V. Poher,et al.  Lensfree in-line holographic detection of bacteria , 2011, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[8]  Magdalena Kwolek-Mirek,et al.  Comparison of methods used for assessing the viability and vitality of yeast cells. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[9]  D. Veal,et al.  Flow cytometry and cell sorting for yeast viability assessment and cell selection , 1998, Yeast.

[10]  Javier García-Alonso,et al.  A prototype microfluidic chip using fluorescent yeast for detection of toxic compounds. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[11]  Yao-Nan Wang,et al.  Multichannel lens‐free CMOS sensors for real‐time monitoring of cell growth , 2015, Electrophoresis.

[12]  A. van den Berg,et al.  Monitoring of yeast cell concentration using a micromachined impedance sensor , 2005, The 13th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2005. Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS '05..

[13]  John Carvell,et al.  Comparison of a new digital imaging technique for yeast cell counting and viability assessments with traditional methods , 2015 .

[14]  Se-Hwan Paek,et al.  A simple and low-cost biofilm quantification method using LED and CMOS image sensor. , 2014, Journal of microbiological methods.

[15]  J. Nielsen,et al.  The role of biofuels in the future energy supply , 2013 .

[16]  M. Galceran,et al.  Use of Fluorescent Probes for Determination of Yeast Cell Viability by Gravitational Field‐Flow Fractionation , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  K. Smart,et al.  Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality , 1999 .